Beyond Binary Thinking: Providing Best Practice Treatment to Veterans with PTSD

David J. Austern
{"title":"Beyond Binary Thinking: Providing Best Practice Treatment to Veterans with PTSD","authors":"David J. Austern","doi":"10.14713/pcsp.v13i2.2006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In \"Written Exposure Therapy as Step One in Reducing the Burden of PTSD: The Composite Cases of \"Alex,' 'Bruno,' and 'Charles'\"(Austern, 2017), I presented three composite case study examples of how veterans suffering from PTSD may benefit from written exposure to their trauma memories. For one case (Bruno), Written Exposure Therapy (WET) was the initial treatment in a stepped-care approach that culminated in Prolonged Exposure therapy. However, for the two others, WET became a standalone treatment. In two commentaries on the cases, Cigrang and Peterson (2017) and Sloan and Marx (2017) discuss the development and efficacy of WET, WET implementation strategies, and practice implications of WET (e.g., the potential to reduce clinician burnout). In my response to these commentaries, I aim to contribute to the bourgeoning discussion of how mental health providers can best incorporate this promising writing-based treatment (WET) into their existing approaches to working with veterans suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). My response will address themes raised by my composite case studies and by the commentaries, including how stepped-care service delivery models may have the potential to make PTSD care more efficient.","PeriodicalId":53239,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy","volume":"13 1","pages":"154-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14713/pcsp.v13i2.2006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In "Written Exposure Therapy as Step One in Reducing the Burden of PTSD: The Composite Cases of "Alex,' 'Bruno,' and 'Charles'"(Austern, 2017), I presented three composite case study examples of how veterans suffering from PTSD may benefit from written exposure to their trauma memories. For one case (Bruno), Written Exposure Therapy (WET) was the initial treatment in a stepped-care approach that culminated in Prolonged Exposure therapy. However, for the two others, WET became a standalone treatment. In two commentaries on the cases, Cigrang and Peterson (2017) and Sloan and Marx (2017) discuss the development and efficacy of WET, WET implementation strategies, and practice implications of WET (e.g., the potential to reduce clinician burnout). In my response to these commentaries, I aim to contribute to the bourgeoning discussion of how mental health providers can best incorporate this promising writing-based treatment (WET) into their existing approaches to working with veterans suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). My response will address themes raised by my composite case studies and by the commentaries, including how stepped-care service delivery models may have the potential to make PTSD care more efficient.
超越二元思维:为患有创伤后应激障碍的退伍军人提供最佳治疗
在“书面暴露疗法作为减轻创伤后应激障碍负担的第一步:Alex,”Bruno,”和“查尔斯”(Austern,2017),我介绍了三个复合案例研究的例子,说明患有创伤后应激障碍的退伍军人如何从书面暴露于他们的创伤记忆中受益是一种阶梯式护理方法的初步治疗,最终导致了长期暴露治疗。然而,对于另外两人来说,WET成为了一种独立的治疗方法。Cigrang和Peterson(2017)以及Sloan和Marx(2017)在两篇案例评论中讨论了WET的发展和疗效、WET实施策略以及WET的实践意义(例如,减少临床医生倦怠的潜力)。在对这些评论的回应中,我的目标是为心理健康提供者如何最好地将这种有前景的基于写作的治疗(WET)纳入他们现有的治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)退伍军人的方法的讨论做出贡献。我的回答将涉及我的综合案例研究和评论中提出的主题,包括分级护理服务提供模式如何有可能提高创伤后应激障碍护理的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信