Lean and Six Sigma in policing: austerity, driver or distraction?

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Bryan Rodgers, J. Antony, Ivor Marshall
{"title":"Lean and Six Sigma in policing: austerity, driver or distraction?","authors":"Bryan Rodgers, J. Antony, Ivor Marshall","doi":"10.1108/IJES-02-2018-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to widen some of the recent discussion which focusses on austerity being the driver for introducing continuous improvement (CI) methodologies, such as Lean and Six Sigma, into policing.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors apply over 80 years combined experience in policing and CI to analyse academic and practitioner literature to summarise the drivers for change and the progress of Lean and Six Sigma in policing and the UK Public Sector.\n\n\nFindings\nThe paper concludes that there are significant gaps in the literature and while there are undoubted challenges, there are overlaps between the strategic direction of policing and the approaches of Lean and Six Sigma.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThere are a small but growing number of papers which evidence the applicability of Lean and Six Sigma in policing.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe paper emphasises the risks to service delivery if factors such as budget constraints are considered in isolation. The paper provides examples of opportunities which may exist in policing as well as introducing ongoing work in policing.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper is among the first to explore the issues of how CI methodologies fit into the strategic direction and challenges of policing services.\n","PeriodicalId":44087,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJES-02-2018-0010","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJES-02-2018-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to widen some of the recent discussion which focusses on austerity being the driver for introducing continuous improvement (CI) methodologies, such as Lean and Six Sigma, into policing. Design/methodology/approach The authors apply over 80 years combined experience in policing and CI to analyse academic and practitioner literature to summarise the drivers for change and the progress of Lean and Six Sigma in policing and the UK Public Sector. Findings The paper concludes that there are significant gaps in the literature and while there are undoubted challenges, there are overlaps between the strategic direction of policing and the approaches of Lean and Six Sigma. Research limitations/implications There are a small but growing number of papers which evidence the applicability of Lean and Six Sigma in policing. Practical implications The paper emphasises the risks to service delivery if factors such as budget constraints are considered in isolation. The paper provides examples of opportunities which may exist in policing as well as introducing ongoing work in policing. Originality/value This paper is among the first to explore the issues of how CI methodologies fit into the strategic direction and challenges of policing services.
警务中的精益与六西格玛:节俭、驱动还是分心?
目的本文的目的是扩大最近的一些讨论,重点是紧缩是将持续改进(CI)方法(如精益和六西格玛)引入警务的驱动力。设计/方法/方法作者运用80多年的警务和CI综合经验,分析学术和实践文献,总结变革的驱动因素以及精益和六西格玛在警务和英国公共部门的进展。发现该论文得出结论,文献中存在重大空白,尽管存在毋庸置疑的挑战,但警务的战略方向与精益和六西格玛方法之间存在重叠。研究局限性/含义有少量但越来越多的论文证明了精益和六西格玛在警务中的适用性。实际含义本文强调了如果孤立地考虑预算限制等因素,则服务提供的风险。本文提供了警务工作中可能存在的机会的例子,并介绍了正在进行的警务工作。原创性/价值本文是第一批探讨CI方法如何适应警务服务的战略方向和挑战的论文之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Emergency Services
International Journal of Emergency Services SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信