Promoting deeper learning in pharmacy education using team-based learning

IF 0.4 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
M. Eksteen, G. Reitsma, E. Fourie
{"title":"Promoting deeper learning in pharmacy education using team-based learning","authors":"M. Eksteen, G. Reitsma, E. Fourie","doi":"10.7196/ajhpe.2021.v13i2.878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The benefit of deep learning compared with surface learning is the ability to retrieve, apply and integrate previously learnt knowledge rather than simply memorising course content most likely to be evaluated during assessments. Team-based learning (TBL) is an educational strategy that echoes the purpose of deeper learning. Objectives. To identify whether TBL as a teaching strategy increases pharmacy students’ understanding of theoretical work. Method. Fourth-year pharmacy students completed a questionnaire consisting of biographical data (gender, age and ethnicity) and 16 questions on their understanding of course content. A total of 183 students (91.5%) participated after giving informed consent that their data may be included in the study. Results. The results indicated that, due to the implementation of TBL in the course, students perceived that they learnt more and made more effort, experienced increased understanding of content, perceived higher knowledge retention, performed better during assessments in the module where TBL was implemented and felt that course outcomes were achieved more easily. Conclusion. TBL as a teaching strategy could potentially promote deeper learning of course content.","PeriodicalId":43683,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Health Professions Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Health Professions Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/ajhpe.2021.v13i2.878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background. The benefit of deep learning compared with surface learning is the ability to retrieve, apply and integrate previously learnt knowledge rather than simply memorising course content most likely to be evaluated during assessments. Team-based learning (TBL) is an educational strategy that echoes the purpose of deeper learning. Objectives. To identify whether TBL as a teaching strategy increases pharmacy students’ understanding of theoretical work. Method. Fourth-year pharmacy students completed a questionnaire consisting of biographical data (gender, age and ethnicity) and 16 questions on their understanding of course content. A total of 183 students (91.5%) participated after giving informed consent that their data may be included in the study. Results. The results indicated that, due to the implementation of TBL in the course, students perceived that they learnt more and made more effort, experienced increased understanding of content, perceived higher knowledge retention, performed better during assessments in the module where TBL was implemented and felt that course outcomes were achieved more easily. Conclusion. TBL as a teaching strategy could potentially promote deeper learning of course content.
运用团队学习促进药学教育的深度学习
背景。与表面学习相比,深度学习的好处在于能够检索、应用和整合以前学过的知识,而不是简单地记忆最有可能在评估期间被评估的课程内容。基于团队的学习(TBL)是一种教育策略,与深度学习的目的相呼应。目标。确定TBL作为一种教学策略是否能提高药学学生对理论工作的理解。方法。四年级的药学学生完成了一份调查问卷,包括个人资料(性别、年龄和种族)和16个关于他们对课程内容理解的问题。共有183名学生(91.5%)在知情同意他们的数据可能被纳入研究后参与了研究。结果。结果表明,由于在课程中实施了TBL,学生认为他们学得更多,付出了更多的努力,对内容的理解增加了,知识保留率提高了,在实施了TBL的模块的评估中表现更好,并且觉得课程成果更容易实现。结论。TBL作为一种教学策略,有可能促进课程内容的深入学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Health Professions Education
African Journal of Health Professions Education HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信