Service innovation research: a bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer

IF 2.9 Q2 BUSINESS
Raj Kumar, Shubham Saxena, Prof Vikas Kumar, V. Prabha, Rohit Kumar, Ankur Kukreti
{"title":"Service innovation research: a bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer","authors":"Raj Kumar, Shubham Saxena, Prof Vikas Kumar, V. Prabha, Rohit Kumar, Ankur Kukreti","doi":"10.1108/cr-01-2023-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\n“The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on service innovation during the past two decades and provide an analysis of sources of publication, citations and authorship using bibliometric analysis techniques (VOSviewer).” This paper aims to assesses the important trends, enhance the academic debate, identify research gaps and propose future directions and a research agenda.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper examines 176 articles in English language published from 2002 to 2022 from the Scopus database by adopting the bibliometric technique using VOSviewer software. This paper analyzes the different levels and boundaries of service innovation using bibliometric analysis of “service innovation research” using VOSviewer software. The methodology analyzes the number of citations, co-citations, keywords, authors, journals and countries.\n\n\nFindings\nThe review of the past 20 years indicates a substantial growth in the number of good research publications on service innovation. The UK, the USA, Sweden and Australia dominate this research area with the most articles published to date under the subject area of “Business management.” The review highlighted that most of the studies on service innovation focused on products, companies and processes in the services industry. The most critical factors behind service innovation failure are improper management and lack of knowledge. The citation analysis revealed various research implications and directions for the future.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study focuses only on service innovation and excludes research on performance management and control. Thus, future studies may explore this area of research in future studies. Only research articles were analyzed; conference papers, reports, manuals and white papers from practice were excluded. Research implications indicate that future studies on service innovation would be essential for organizational excellence, not process excellence.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current status and essential trends of research on service innovation. This study identifies the research gaps and provides a clear research agenda for understanding the various elements of service innovation.\n","PeriodicalId":46521,"journal":{"name":"Competitiveness Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competitiveness Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cr-01-2023-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose “The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on service innovation during the past two decades and provide an analysis of sources of publication, citations and authorship using bibliometric analysis techniques (VOSviewer).” This paper aims to assesses the important trends, enhance the academic debate, identify research gaps and propose future directions and a research agenda. Design/methodology/approach This paper examines 176 articles in English language published from 2002 to 2022 from the Scopus database by adopting the bibliometric technique using VOSviewer software. This paper analyzes the different levels and boundaries of service innovation using bibliometric analysis of “service innovation research” using VOSviewer software. The methodology analyzes the number of citations, co-citations, keywords, authors, journals and countries. Findings The review of the past 20 years indicates a substantial growth in the number of good research publications on service innovation. The UK, the USA, Sweden and Australia dominate this research area with the most articles published to date under the subject area of “Business management.” The review highlighted that most of the studies on service innovation focused on products, companies and processes in the services industry. The most critical factors behind service innovation failure are improper management and lack of knowledge. The citation analysis revealed various research implications and directions for the future. Research limitations/implications This study focuses only on service innovation and excludes research on performance management and control. Thus, future studies may explore this area of research in future studies. Only research articles were analyzed; conference papers, reports, manuals and white papers from practice were excluded. Research implications indicate that future studies on service innovation would be essential for organizational excellence, not process excellence. Originality/value This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current status and essential trends of research on service innovation. This study identifies the research gaps and provides a clear research agenda for understanding the various elements of service innovation.
服务创新研究:基于VOSviewer的文献计量分析
“本文的目的是回顾过去二十年来关于服务创新的文献,并使用文献计量分析技术(VOSviewer)对出版物来源、引用和作者进行分析。”本文旨在评估重要趋势,加强学术辩论,确定研究差距,并提出未来的方向和研究议程。设计/方法/方法本文采用文献计量学技术,使用VOSviewer软件对Scopus数据库中2002年至2022年发表的176篇英文论文进行了分析。本文利用VOSviewer软件对“服务创新研究”进行文献计量分析,分析了服务创新的不同层次和边界。该方法分析了被引次数、共被引次数、关键词、作者、期刊和国家。研究结果回顾过去二十年,有关服务创新的优秀研究刊物数目大幅增加。英国、美国、瑞典和澳大利亚主导了这一研究领域,迄今为止在“企业管理”主题领域发表的文章最多。回顾强调,大多数关于服务创新的研究都集中在服务行业的产品、公司和流程上。服务创新失败最关键的因素是管理不当和缺乏知识。通过对引文的分析,揭示了今后的研究方向和意义。研究局限/启示本研究仅关注服务创新,未涉及绩效管理与控制的研究。因此,未来的研究可以在未来的研究中探索这一领域的研究。只分析了研究论文;来自实践的会议文件、报告、手册和白皮书被排除在外。研究结果表明,未来对服务创新的研究将是组织卓越的关键,而不是过程卓越。原创性/价值本文全面概述了服务创新研究的现状和基本趋势。本研究确定了研究差距,并为理解服务创新的各种要素提供了明确的研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
17.20%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The following list indicates the key issues in the Competitiveness Review. We invite papers on these and related topics. Special issues of the Review will collect papers on specific topics selected by the editors. Definition/conceptual framework of competitiveness Competitiveness diagnostics and rankings Competitiveness and economic outcomes Specific dimensions of competitiveness Competitiveness and endowments Competitiveness and economic development Location and business strategy International business and the role of MNCs Innovation and innovative capacity Clusters and cluster initiatives Institutions for competitiveness Public policy (e.g., innovation, cluster development, regional development) The Competitiveness Review aims to publish high quality papers directed at scholars, government institutions, businesses and practitioners. It appears in collaboration with key academic and professional groups in the field of competitiveness analysis and policy, including the Microeconomics of Competitiveness (MOC) network and The Competitiveness Institute (TCI) practitioner network for competitiveness, clusters and innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信