Catequese em Puebla: teologias em conflito

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Solange Maria do Carmo
{"title":"Catequese em Puebla: teologias em conflito","authors":"Solange Maria do Carmo","doi":"10.5752/p.2175-5841.2019v17n54p1458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since Medellin, catechesis has continued to affirm absolute unity between human history and the history of salvation, once it understood that God reveals himself through the concrete human situation. In Puebla, however, this conviction was shaken. In the chapter reserved for catechesis, a conflict of theologies subliminally appears, marked by the presence of some antithetical parallels, such as the human situation and revealed doctrine; situation catechesis and doctrinal catechesis, mere memorizing and absence of memory. Underlying the nostalgia of a certain catechesis that does not neglect the doctrine in favor of Christian praxis, a theological tension is hidden. No doubt, not all the whole episcopate in Puebla was convinced that the most human ways are exactly the most divine ones; not everyone shared the claim that God is manifested in human history and takes sides with the impoverished and suffering people. Through the study of the Catechesis Document, item 3 of chapter 3 of the Puebla Conclusions, this article aims to show the coexistence of two theologies at the 1979 Latin American Episcopal Conference. The first one was more Christo derivative, in the light of Medellin, that favors the People of God ecclesiology, valuing every baptized person and their daily reality; the other one was more Theo derivative, which makes possible the ecclesiology \"Body of Christ”, which comprehends the Church as a perfect society, hierarchically organized, independent of the ways of humanity.","PeriodicalId":43247,"journal":{"name":"Horizonte-Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciencias da Religiao","volume":"1 1","pages":"1458-1458"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horizonte-Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciencias da Religiao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5752/p.2175-5841.2019v17n54p1458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since Medellin, catechesis has continued to affirm absolute unity between human history and the history of salvation, once it understood that God reveals himself through the concrete human situation. In Puebla, however, this conviction was shaken. In the chapter reserved for catechesis, a conflict of theologies subliminally appears, marked by the presence of some antithetical parallels, such as the human situation and revealed doctrine; situation catechesis and doctrinal catechesis, mere memorizing and absence of memory. Underlying the nostalgia of a certain catechesis that does not neglect the doctrine in favor of Christian praxis, a theological tension is hidden. No doubt, not all the whole episcopate in Puebla was convinced that the most human ways are exactly the most divine ones; not everyone shared the claim that God is manifested in human history and takes sides with the impoverished and suffering people. Through the study of the Catechesis Document, item 3 of chapter 3 of the Puebla Conclusions, this article aims to show the coexistence of two theologies at the 1979 Latin American Episcopal Conference. The first one was more Christo derivative, in the light of Medellin, that favors the People of God ecclesiology, valuing every baptized person and their daily reality; the other one was more Theo derivative, which makes possible the ecclesiology "Body of Christ”, which comprehends the Church as a perfect society, hierarchically organized, independent of the ways of humanity.
普埃布拉的教义问答:冲突中的神学
自麦德林以来,卡特西斯继续肯定人类历史和救赎历史之间的绝对统一,一旦它明白上帝通过具体的人类处境来揭示自己。然而,在普埃布拉,这种信念被动摇了。在为catechesis保留的章节中,神学的冲突潜意识地出现了,其标志是存在一些对立的相似之处,例如人类处境和揭示的学说;情境范畴与教条主义范畴,单纯记忆与无记忆。在某种类别的怀旧情绪背后,隐藏着一种神学张力,这种怀旧情绪并不忽视有利于基督教实践的教义。毫无疑问,并不是普埃布拉的所有主教都相信,最人性化的方式正是最神圣的方式;并不是每个人都认同上帝在人类历史上的表现,并站在贫困和苦难的人民一边。本文通过对《普埃布拉结论》第三章第三项Catecheis文件的研究,旨在展示1979年拉丁美洲圣公会会议上两种神学的共存。根据麦德林的观点,第一个更像是克里斯托的衍生物,有利于上帝的子民教会学,重视每一个受洗的人和他们的日常现实;另一种是提奥的衍生物,这使得教会学“基督的身体”成为可能,它将教会理解为一个完美的社会,有组织,独立于人类的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信