The impact of adherence to the American College of Critical Care Medicine 2017 guidelines in the management of septic shock in pediatric intensive care units: A prospective observational study

G. Kochar, P. Tripathi, P. Rai, P. Prasad
{"title":"The impact of adherence to the American College of Critical Care Medicine 2017 guidelines in the management of septic shock in pediatric intensive care units: A prospective observational study","authors":"G. Kochar, P. Tripathi, P. Rai, P. Prasad","doi":"10.4103/jpcc.jpcc_48_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite tremendous advances and new guidelines for the management of pediatric septic shock, the mortality and morbidity associated with it remain unacceptably high. This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of adherence to the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) guidelines in the management of septic shock in pediatric intensive care units (PICU). Subjects and Methods: This was a hospital-based prospective observational study conducted in the 15-bedded PICU of a tertiary care hospital in Utter Pradesh, India. Children from 1 month to 18 years of age admitted to the PICU with septic shock were included in the study as per definitions given by ACCM guidelines. The children who were managed strictly adhering to ACCM guidelines were labeled as the adherent group and those who were managed with any deviation from these guidelines were considered as the nonadherent group. The two groups were compared with respect to outcome. Results: In this study, the prevalence of septic shock was 54.4% in PICU. Out of 124 cases of septic shock, 93 were from the adherent group and 31 were from the nonadherent group. Recovery was significantly higher (p-0.012) in children among the adherent group (56 [60.21%] vs. 11 [35.48%]) than in the nonadherent group. The hemodynamic stability achieved within 48 h among the adherent group was higher in comparison to the nonadherent group (39 [56%] vs. 6 [8.5%]) making this a significant (P = 0.007) observation. Conclusions: Strict adherence to the ACCM guidelines was associated with favorable outcomes in the management of septic shock in children.","PeriodicalId":34184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Critical Care","volume":"9 1","pages":"208 - 212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpcc.jpcc_48_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Despite tremendous advances and new guidelines for the management of pediatric septic shock, the mortality and morbidity associated with it remain unacceptably high. This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of adherence to the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) guidelines in the management of septic shock in pediatric intensive care units (PICU). Subjects and Methods: This was a hospital-based prospective observational study conducted in the 15-bedded PICU of a tertiary care hospital in Utter Pradesh, India. Children from 1 month to 18 years of age admitted to the PICU with septic shock were included in the study as per definitions given by ACCM guidelines. The children who were managed strictly adhering to ACCM guidelines were labeled as the adherent group and those who were managed with any deviation from these guidelines were considered as the nonadherent group. The two groups were compared with respect to outcome. Results: In this study, the prevalence of septic shock was 54.4% in PICU. Out of 124 cases of septic shock, 93 were from the adherent group and 31 were from the nonadherent group. Recovery was significantly higher (p-0.012) in children among the adherent group (56 [60.21%] vs. 11 [35.48%]) than in the nonadherent group. The hemodynamic stability achieved within 48 h among the adherent group was higher in comparison to the nonadherent group (39 [56%] vs. 6 [8.5%]) making this a significant (P = 0.007) observation. Conclusions: Strict adherence to the ACCM guidelines was associated with favorable outcomes in the management of septic shock in children.
遵守美国重症医学会2017年指南对儿科重症监护病房脓毒性休克管理的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究
背景:尽管在儿童感染性休克的治疗方面取得了巨大的进步和新的指导方针,但与之相关的死亡率和发病率仍然高得令人无法接受。本研究旨在评估遵守美国重症医学学院(ACCM)指南对儿科重症监护病房(PICU)脓毒性休克管理的影响。研究对象和方法:这是一项基于医院的前瞻性观察性研究,在印度阿特邦一家三级医院的15个床位的PICU中进行。根据ACCM指南给出的定义,将1个月至18岁的感染性休克患儿纳入PICU。严格按照ACCM指导方针进行管理的儿童被标记为依从组,而那些与这些指导方针有任何偏差的儿童被视为非依从组。比较两组的结果。结果:本组PICU脓毒性休克发生率为54.4%。124例脓毒性休克患者中,粘附组93例,非粘附组31例。黏附组患儿康复率(56例[60.21%]比11例[35.48%])显著高于非黏附组(p = 0.012)。黏附组在48小时内达到的血流动力学稳定性高于非黏附组(39[56%]比6[8.5%]),这是一个显著的观察结果(P = 0.007)。结论:严格遵守ACCM指南与儿童感染性休克治疗的良好结果相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信