Development of an alcohol withdrawal risk stratification tool based on patients referred to an addiction liaison nursing service in Glasgow

IF 0.9 Q3 Psychology
G. Benson, A. McPherson, J. McCallum, N. Roberts
{"title":"Development of an alcohol withdrawal risk stratification tool based on patients referred to an addiction liaison nursing service in Glasgow","authors":"G. Benson, A. McPherson, J. McCallum, N. Roberts","doi":"10.1108/DAT-02-2019-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to develop an alcohol withdrawal syndrome risk stratification tool that could support the safe discharge of low risk patients from the emergency department.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA retrospective cohort study that included all patients referred to the acute addiction liaison nursing service over one calendar month (n=400, 1–30 April 2016) was undertaken. Bivariate and multivariate modelling identified the significant variables that supported the prediction of severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome (SAWS) in the cohort population.\n\n\nFindings\nThe Glasgow Modified Alcohol Withdrawal Scale (GMAWS), hours since last drink, fast alcohol screening test (FAST) and systolic blood pressure correctly identified 89 per cent of patients who developed SAWS and 84 per cent of patients that did not. Increasing each component by a score of one is associated with an increase in the odds of SAWS by a factor of 2.76 (95% CI 2.21, 3.45), 1.31 (95% CI 1.24, 1.37), 1.30 (95% CI 1.08, 1.57) and 1.22 (95% CI 1.10, 1.34), respectively.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe research was conducted in a single healthcare system that had a high prevalence of alcohol dependence syndrome (ADS). Second, the developed risk stratification tool was unable to guarantee no risk and lastly, the FAST score previously aligned to severe ADS may have influenced the patients highest GMAWS score.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe tool could help redesign the care pathway for patients who attend the emergency department at risk of SAWS and link low risk patients with community alcohol services better equipped to deal with their physical and psychological needs short and long term supporting engagement, abstinence and prolongation of life.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe tool could help redesign the care pathway for emergency department patients at low risk of SAWS and link them with community alcohol services better equipped to deal with their physical and psychological needs, short and long term, supporting engagement, abstinence and prolongation of life.\n","PeriodicalId":44780,"journal":{"name":"Drugs and Alcohol Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/DAT-02-2019-0009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs and Alcohol Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/DAT-02-2019-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop an alcohol withdrawal syndrome risk stratification tool that could support the safe discharge of low risk patients from the emergency department. Design/methodology/approach A retrospective cohort study that included all patients referred to the acute addiction liaison nursing service over one calendar month (n=400, 1–30 April 2016) was undertaken. Bivariate and multivariate modelling identified the significant variables that supported the prediction of severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome (SAWS) in the cohort population. Findings The Glasgow Modified Alcohol Withdrawal Scale (GMAWS), hours since last drink, fast alcohol screening test (FAST) and systolic blood pressure correctly identified 89 per cent of patients who developed SAWS and 84 per cent of patients that did not. Increasing each component by a score of one is associated with an increase in the odds of SAWS by a factor of 2.76 (95% CI 2.21, 3.45), 1.31 (95% CI 1.24, 1.37), 1.30 (95% CI 1.08, 1.57) and 1.22 (95% CI 1.10, 1.34), respectively. Research limitations/implications The research was conducted in a single healthcare system that had a high prevalence of alcohol dependence syndrome (ADS). Second, the developed risk stratification tool was unable to guarantee no risk and lastly, the FAST score previously aligned to severe ADS may have influenced the patients highest GMAWS score. Practical implications The tool could help redesign the care pathway for patients who attend the emergency department at risk of SAWS and link low risk patients with community alcohol services better equipped to deal with their physical and psychological needs short and long term supporting engagement, abstinence and prolongation of life. Originality/value The tool could help redesign the care pathway for emergency department patients at low risk of SAWS and link them with community alcohol services better equipped to deal with their physical and psychological needs, short and long term, supporting engagement, abstinence and prolongation of life.
基于格拉斯哥成瘾联络护理服务转诊患者的酒精戒断风险分层工具的开发
目的建立酒精戒断综合征风险分层工具,为急诊科低危患者安全出院提供支持。设计/方法/方法进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了所有在一个月内转诊到急性成瘾联络护理服务的患者(n=400, 2016年4月1日至30日)。双变量和多变量模型确定了支持在队列人群中预测严重酒精戒断综合征(SAWS)的重要变量。格拉斯哥改良酒精戒断量表(GMAWS)、最后一次饮酒后的几个小时、快速酒精筛查试验(fast)和收缩压正确地识别出89%的患有SAWS的患者和84%的未患SAWS的患者。每增加1分,SAWS的发生率分别增加2.76 (95% CI 2.21, 3.45)、1.31 (95% CI 1.24, 1.37)、1.30 (95% CI 1.08, 1.57)和1.22 (95% CI 1.10, 1.34)。研究局限性/意义本研究是在一个酒精依赖综合征(ADS)高发的单一医疗保健系统中进行的。其次,开发的风险分层工具无法保证无风险,最后,FAST评分先前与严重ADS一致可能影响患者的最高GMAWS评分。实际意义该工具有助于重新设计急诊科有SAWS风险的患者的护理途径,并将低风险患者与社区酒精服务联系起来,更好地满足他们的生理和心理需求,短期和长期支持参与、戒酒和延长生命。独创性/价值该工具可以帮助重新设计急诊科低风险患者的护理途径,并将他们与社区酒精服务联系起来,这些服务能够更好地满足他们的短期和长期生理和心理需求,支持参与、戒酒和延长生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs and Alcohol Today
Drugs and Alcohol Today SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信