Sources of validity evidence in the assessment of perceived motor competence in Brazilian schoolchildren

Wivianne Abreu Cavalcante, B. Palma, A. H. P. Feitoza, E. Peixoto, M. T. Cattuzzo
{"title":"Sources of validity evidence in the assessment of perceived motor competence in Brazilian schoolchildren","authors":"Wivianne Abreu Cavalcante, B. Palma, A. H. P. Feitoza, E. Peixoto, M. T. Cattuzzo","doi":"10.7322/abcshs.2021109.1837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The judgment a child makes about his/her competence in the motor domain is known as perceived motor competence, a key element in building the child's healthy behavior; a Pictorial Scale of Perceived Movement Skill Competence (PMSC) seems to be a suitable perceived motor competence’s assessment, but its validity needs to be evaluated. Objective: To examine the internal structure, the convergent validity, and the reproducibility of the PMSC. Methods: The sample comprised 187 Brazilian healthy schoolchildren (9.6 years ± 0.8); it was applied to the questionnaires PMSC and the Self-Perception Profile for Children scale. Results: PMSC's confirmatory factor analyses indicated adjustment indexes classified as adequate for a two-factor model; there were satisfactory reliability indices (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.654 and 0.652 for locomotion and object control sub domains, respectively); convergent validity (r=0.41 and r=0.56, p<0.001, for locomotion and object control sub domains, respectively). Conclusion: These results contribute to the accumulation of sources of evidence for the PMSC as a valid tool for perceived motor competence assessment in a local and global context.","PeriodicalId":30632,"journal":{"name":"ABCS Health Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABCS Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7322/abcshs.2021109.1837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: The judgment a child makes about his/her competence in the motor domain is known as perceived motor competence, a key element in building the child's healthy behavior; a Pictorial Scale of Perceived Movement Skill Competence (PMSC) seems to be a suitable perceived motor competence’s assessment, but its validity needs to be evaluated. Objective: To examine the internal structure, the convergent validity, and the reproducibility of the PMSC. Methods: The sample comprised 187 Brazilian healthy schoolchildren (9.6 years ± 0.8); it was applied to the questionnaires PMSC and the Self-Perception Profile for Children scale. Results: PMSC's confirmatory factor analyses indicated adjustment indexes classified as adequate for a two-factor model; there were satisfactory reliability indices (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.654 and 0.652 for locomotion and object control sub domains, respectively); convergent validity (r=0.41 and r=0.56, p<0.001, for locomotion and object control sub domains, respectively). Conclusion: These results contribute to the accumulation of sources of evidence for the PMSC as a valid tool for perceived motor competence assessment in a local and global context.
评估巴西学童感知运动能力的有效性证据来源
儿童对自己在运动领域能力的判断被称为感知运动能力,是建立儿童健康行为的关键因素;知觉运动技能能力图式量表(PMSC)似乎是一种比较合适的知觉运动能力评价量表,但其效度有待进一步评价。目的:考察PMSC的内部结构、收敛效度和重现性。方法:选取187名巴西健康学龄儿童(9.6岁±0.8岁);将其应用于问卷PMSC和儿童自我知觉量表。结果:PMSC的验证性因子分析表明,调整指标被分类为适合双因素模型;运动子域和目标控制子域的信度分别为0.654和0.652;收敛效度(r=0.41和r=0.56, p<0.001,分别为运动和物体控制子域)。结论:这些结果为PMSC在局部和全球范围内作为感知运动能力评估的有效工具提供了证据来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信