Actitudes, capacidades y barreras percibidas en investigación de las enfermeras del Servicio Canario de la Salud

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING
Héctor González-de la Torre , David Díaz-Pérez , Ricardo José Pinto-Plasencia , Begoña Reyero-Ortega , Elizabeth Hernández-González , Conrado Domínguez-Trujillo
{"title":"Actitudes, capacidades y barreras percibidas en investigación de las enfermeras del Servicio Canario de la Salud","authors":"Héctor González-de la Torre ,&nbsp;David Díaz-Pérez ,&nbsp;Ricardo José Pinto-Plasencia ,&nbsp;Begoña Reyero-Ortega ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Hernández-González ,&nbsp;Conrado Domínguez-Trujillo","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcli.2023.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the attitudes, capacities and perceived barriers associated with research among nurses and midwives of the Canary Health Service (SCS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Descriptive observational cross-sectional study with an analytical component carried out in the different SCS departments by means of an online survey in which sociodemographic and specific variables, the Spanish version of the Attitudes towards Research and Development within Nursing Questionnaire (ATRDNQ-e) instrument and the BARRIERS scale were collected. Authorisation was obtained from the two provincial ethics committees. A descriptive and inferential analysis (Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test, post hoc contrast by Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligne test) was performed with JAMOVI® v.2.3.24 software.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 512 nurses and midwives with a mean age of 41.82 years participated in the study. Regarding the scores with the ATRDNQ-e instrument, the dimension with the lowest score was «Language of research» (Mean = 3.55/SD = 0.84) and the highest «Assessment of nursing research and development of the nursing discipline» (Mean = 4.54/SD = 0.52). The total mean score with the BARRIERS scale was 54.33 (SD = 16.52), with «Organizational characteristics» being the highest scoring subscale (Mean = 17.25/SD = 5.90). The two highest perceived barriers were «Not enough time at work to implement new ideas» (Mean = 2.55/SD = 1.11) and «Nursing does not have time to read research» (Mean = 2.46/ SD = 1.11).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SCS nurses have a positive attitude towards research, although there are some barriers where improvement actions for nursing research should be implemented.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46453,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Clinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130862123000657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the attitudes, capacities and perceived barriers associated with research among nurses and midwives of the Canary Health Service (SCS).

Methods

Descriptive observational cross-sectional study with an analytical component carried out in the different SCS departments by means of an online survey in which sociodemographic and specific variables, the Spanish version of the Attitudes towards Research and Development within Nursing Questionnaire (ATRDNQ-e) instrument and the BARRIERS scale were collected. Authorisation was obtained from the two provincial ethics committees. A descriptive and inferential analysis (Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test, post hoc contrast by Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligne test) was performed with JAMOVI® v.2.3.24 software.

Results

A total of 512 nurses and midwives with a mean age of 41.82 years participated in the study. Regarding the scores with the ATRDNQ-e instrument, the dimension with the lowest score was «Language of research» (Mean = 3.55/SD = 0.84) and the highest «Assessment of nursing research and development of the nursing discipline» (Mean = 4.54/SD = 0.52). The total mean score with the BARRIERS scale was 54.33 (SD = 16.52), with «Organizational characteristics» being the highest scoring subscale (Mean = 17.25/SD = 5.90). The two highest perceived barriers were «Not enough time at work to implement new ideas» (Mean = 2.55/SD = 1.11) and «Nursing does not have time to read research» (Mean = 2.46/ SD = 1.11).

Conclusions

SCS nurses have a positive attitude towards research, although there are some barriers where improvement actions for nursing research should be implemented.

研究金丝雀保健服务护士的态度、能力和障碍
目的了解加纳利卫生服务中心(SCS)护士和助产士对研究的态度、能力和感知障碍。方法通过收集社会人口学和特定变量、西班牙语版护理人员对研究和发展的态度问卷(ATRDNQ-e)和障碍量表的在线调查,在不同SCS科室进行描述性观察性横断面研究,并辅以分析成分。获得了两个省级伦理委员会的授权。采用JAMOVI®v.2.3.24软件进行描述性和推理分析(Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验,事后对比采用Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligne检验)。结果共512名护士和助产士参与研究,平均年龄41.82岁。在ATRDNQ-e量表得分方面,得分最低的维度是“研究语言”(Mean = 3.55/SD = 0.84),得分最高的维度是“护理学科研究与发展评估”(Mean = 4.54/SD = 0.52)。障碍量表的总平均得分为54.33 (SD = 16.52),“组织特征”是得分最高的子量表(mean = 17.25/SD = 5.90)。两个最高的障碍是“没有足够的工作时间来实施新想法”(平均= 2.55/SD = 1.11)和“护理人员没有时间阅读研究”(平均= 2.46/ SD = 1.11)。结论scs护士对护理研究的态度是积极的,但仍存在一些障碍,需要采取改进措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Enfermería Clínica is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is a useful and necessary tool for nursing professionals from the different areas of nursing (healthcare, administration, education and research) as well as for healthcare professionals involved in caring for persons, families and the community. It is the only Spanish nursing journal that mainly publishes original research. The aim of the Journal is to promote increased knowledge through the publication of original research and other studies that may help nursing professionals improve their daily practice. This objective is pursued throughout the different sections that comprise the Journal: Original Articles and Short Original Articles, Special Articles, Patient Care and Letters to the Editor. There is also an Evidence-Based Nursing section that includes comments about original articles of special interest written by experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信