Geology as Somatechnics: Re-imagining Human and Technology Entanglements in Geologies of the Future

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Jianni Tien, Eloise Florence
{"title":"Geology as Somatechnics: Re-imagining Human and Technology Entanglements in Geologies of the Future","authors":"Jianni Tien, Eloise Florence","doi":"10.3366/soma.2022.0377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article we offer a textual analysis informed by feminist framings of the geologic as a somatechnic research practice. The turn to geology in recent feminist scholarship responds to the explosion of discourse on the Anthropocene (itself a geologic term) interrogating the power relations implicit in geology as a seemingly objective research practice and epistemology. We use this theoretical standpoint on geology to analyse two literary representations of geologies of the future –  Dawn by Octavia Butler and Earth After Us by Jan Zalasiewicz. In Earth After Us, aliens of the future mine the depths of the earth to understand humans’ relationship with the planet and planetary annihilation. In Dawn, aliens mine the geology of human flesh and genetics to understand the same thing. Through our analysis we demonstrate the ways that geology, as a specifically Western epistemology and research practice, relies on the distinction between the body – ‘bio’ – and nature – ‘geo’ – that Povinelli has termed ‘Geontopower’ (2016). Geontopower traces the ways that the research practices and epistemologies of geology are built from Western perspectives, that in turn are built on the backs of bodies – the slave power that built empires, as well as the long fossilised bodies that have powered capitalism. Through a feminist lens we demonstrate how these text’s representations of future geologies articulate a somatechnics in which bodies and technologies are intertwined. We argue that thinking geologically is a somatechnical research practice that reveals the extractive epistemologies implicit in ‘the White Geology of the Anthropocene’ ( Yusoff 2018 ). We conclude by offering a somatechnic geology in which the entangled relationships between bodies and systems of colonialism and capitalism are acknowledged as imbricated in the layers of flesh of humans and the planet alike, in order to imagine more just futures in an era of ecological urgency.","PeriodicalId":43420,"journal":{"name":"Somatechnics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatechnics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/soma.2022.0377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article we offer a textual analysis informed by feminist framings of the geologic as a somatechnic research practice. The turn to geology in recent feminist scholarship responds to the explosion of discourse on the Anthropocene (itself a geologic term) interrogating the power relations implicit in geology as a seemingly objective research practice and epistemology. We use this theoretical standpoint on geology to analyse two literary representations of geologies of the future –  Dawn by Octavia Butler and Earth After Us by Jan Zalasiewicz. In Earth After Us, aliens of the future mine the depths of the earth to understand humans’ relationship with the planet and planetary annihilation. In Dawn, aliens mine the geology of human flesh and genetics to understand the same thing. Through our analysis we demonstrate the ways that geology, as a specifically Western epistemology and research practice, relies on the distinction between the body – ‘bio’ – and nature – ‘geo’ – that Povinelli has termed ‘Geontopower’ (2016). Geontopower traces the ways that the research practices and epistemologies of geology are built from Western perspectives, that in turn are built on the backs of bodies – the slave power that built empires, as well as the long fossilised bodies that have powered capitalism. Through a feminist lens we demonstrate how these text’s representations of future geologies articulate a somatechnics in which bodies and technologies are intertwined. We argue that thinking geologically is a somatechnical research practice that reveals the extractive epistemologies implicit in ‘the White Geology of the Anthropocene’ ( Yusoff 2018 ). We conclude by offering a somatechnic geology in which the entangled relationships between bodies and systems of colonialism and capitalism are acknowledged as imbricated in the layers of flesh of humans and the planet alike, in order to imagine more just futures in an era of ecological urgency.
地质学作为本体:重新想象人类和技术在未来地质学中的纠缠
在这篇文章中,我们提供了一个基于女性主义框架的文本分析,将地质学作为一种躯体技术研究实践。最近女权主义学术界转向地质学,是对人类世(本身是一个地质术语)话语激增的回应,质疑地质学作为一种看似客观的研究实践和认识论所隐含的权力关系。我们用地质学的这一理论立场来分析未来地质学的两种文学表现 –  Octavia Butler的《黎明》和Jan Zalasiewicz的《我们之后的地球》。在《我们之后的地球》中,未来的外星人挖掘地球深处,以了解人类与地球的关系和行星毁灭。在《黎明》中,外星人挖掘了人体的地质和遗传学,以了解同样的事情。通过我们的分析,我们展示了地质学作为一种特定的西方认识论和研究实践,依赖于身体之间的区别 – ‘生物 – 和自然 – ‘geo' – Povinelli称之为“Geontopower”(2016)。Geontopower追溯了地质学的研究实践和认识论是从西方的角度建立起来的,反过来又是建立在身体的背面 – 建立帝国的奴隶力量,以及为资本主义提供动力的长期僵化的身体。通过女权主义的视角,我们展示了这些文本对未来地质学的表述是如何阐明身体和技术交织在一起的躯体技术的。我们认为,地质学思维是一种身体技术研究实践,揭示了“人类世的白色地质学”(Yusoff 2018)中隐含的提取认识论。最后,我们提供了一种身体技术地质学,在这种地质学中,殖民主义和资本主义的身体和系统之间的纠缠关系被认为是在人类和地球的肉层中叠加的,以便在生态紧迫的时代想象更公正的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Somatechnics
Somatechnics SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信