Práticas de trabalho da cultura popular no agreste de Pernambuco: entre o moderno e o tradicional

Elisabeth Cavalcante dos Santos, Diogo Henrique Helal
{"title":"Práticas de trabalho da cultura popular no agreste de Pernambuco: entre o moderno e o tradicional","authors":"Elisabeth Cavalcante dos Santos, Diogo Henrique Helal","doi":"10.21529/RECADM.2017009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article has as a research question the following: \"how the hybridity between traditional and modern ethos are present in the work practices of the popular culture in the Agreste of Pernambuco?” In this sense, we aimed to understand the traditional-modern hybridism in the work practices of the popular culture in the Agreste of Pernambuco and the answers given to these hybridisms, from the study of two cultural organizations: a band of pifano and the bumba-meu-boi group. In order to achieve such, a theoretical understanding matrix was proposed, which adds the practice notion of Practical Based Studies, and more specifically, the ethnomethodology, to the Weberian notions of ethos and social action, in order to understand what hybrid practices are. Through the epistemology of Practical Based Studies, of ethnomethodological method, and a qualitative approach, we conducted and recorded semi-structured interviews, informal conversations, and participant observations. Through analysis of ethnomethodological orientation, considering as analytical categories the notion of practice, member, language and meanings, we identified seven existing practices in the work context of popular culture organizations. Using the proposed theoretical understanding matrix, which has as analytical categories the notions of ethos and social action, several hybridisms have been identified in each practice, mainly because some practices have ethos in whose orientation is essentially traditional, but financial resources are necessary for the maintenance of these practices, resulting in the need to elaborate cultural projects, official documents, laws, etc., for specific purposes. Responses to the hybridisms have been observed, among them, the action of the leaders of popular culture groups, who walk between the traditional and the modern ethos, using modern means to maintain the traditional, evidencing the existence of an interdependence between these elements. As the main contribution of the present research, we highlight the proposed multi and interdisciplinary approach in order to understand complex phenomena such as the work with popular culture.","PeriodicalId":30138,"journal":{"name":"Revista Eletronica de Ciencia Administrativa","volume":"16 1","pages":"127-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Eletronica de Ciencia Administrativa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21529/RECADM.2017009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This article has as a research question the following: "how the hybridity between traditional and modern ethos are present in the work practices of the popular culture in the Agreste of Pernambuco?” In this sense, we aimed to understand the traditional-modern hybridism in the work practices of the popular culture in the Agreste of Pernambuco and the answers given to these hybridisms, from the study of two cultural organizations: a band of pifano and the bumba-meu-boi group. In order to achieve such, a theoretical understanding matrix was proposed, which adds the practice notion of Practical Based Studies, and more specifically, the ethnomethodology, to the Weberian notions of ethos and social action, in order to understand what hybrid practices are. Through the epistemology of Practical Based Studies, of ethnomethodological method, and a qualitative approach, we conducted and recorded semi-structured interviews, informal conversations, and participant observations. Through analysis of ethnomethodological orientation, considering as analytical categories the notion of practice, member, language and meanings, we identified seven existing practices in the work context of popular culture organizations. Using the proposed theoretical understanding matrix, which has as analytical categories the notions of ethos and social action, several hybridisms have been identified in each practice, mainly because some practices have ethos in whose orientation is essentially traditional, but financial resources are necessary for the maintenance of these practices, resulting in the need to elaborate cultural projects, official documents, laws, etc., for specific purposes. Responses to the hybridisms have been observed, among them, the action of the leaders of popular culture groups, who walk between the traditional and the modern ethos, using modern means to maintain the traditional, evidencing the existence of an interdependence between these elements. As the main contribution of the present research, we highlight the proposed multi and interdisciplinary approach in order to understand complex phenomena such as the work with popular culture.
伯南布哥荒野中流行文化的工作实践:介于现代与传统之间
本文的研究问题是:“传统与现代精神的混合是如何在伯南布哥省流行文化的工作实践中表现出来的?”在这个意义上,我们旨在了解伯南布哥地区流行文化工作实践中的传统-现代混合主义,并从两个文化组织:皮法诺乐队和bumba-meu-boi团体的研究中给出这些混合主义的答案。为了实现这一目标,提出了一个理论理解矩阵,它将实践基础研究的实践概念,更具体地说,是民族方法学,添加到韦伯的精神和社会行动概念中,以理解什么是混合实践。通过实践基础研究的认识论、民族方法学方法和定性方法,我们进行并记录了半结构化访谈、非正式对话和参与者观察。通过对民族方法学取向的分析,将实践、成员、语言和意义的概念作为分析范畴,我们确定了大众文化组织工作环境中的七种现有实践。使用所提出的理论理解矩阵(其分析类别为精神气质和社会行动的概念),在每种实践中都确定了几种混合主义,主要是因为一些实践具有精神气质,其取向本质上是传统的,但维持这些实践需要财政资源,因此需要为特定目的精心制定文化项目、官方文件、法律等。已经观察到对混合主义的反应,其中包括流行文化团体领导人的行动,他们游走在传统和现代精神之间,使用现代手段来维持传统,证明这些元素之间存在相互依存关系。作为本研究的主要贡献,我们强调了提出的多学科交叉的方法,以理解复杂的现象,如与流行文化的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信