Effects of Professional Skepticism, Competency and Workload Compression on the Ability to Detect Possible Fraud among Government Auditors

IF 0.3 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
M. Solichin, Zuraidah Mohd-Sanusi, R. Johari, Tri Gunarsih
{"title":"Effects of Professional Skepticism, Competency and Workload Compression on the Ability to Detect Possible Fraud among Government Auditors","authors":"M. Solichin, Zuraidah Mohd-Sanusi, R. Johari, Tri Gunarsih","doi":"10.24191/apmaj.v16i3-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of professional scepticism, competence, and workload compression on an auditor's ability to detect potential fraud. This sample consisted of 149 government auditors from the Indonesian Local Government Inspectorate. Data was gathered through the use of a questionnaire and analysed using the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. The findings revealed that internal attribution (professional scepticism and competency) have a significant impact on an auditor's ability to detect the possibility of fraud. Workload compression as an external attribution, did not have a meaningful influence on an auditor's ability to detect probable fraud. Workload reduction was also found to be ineffective in moderating the relationship between internal attribution and an auditor's ability to detect probable fraud. The findings can guide local governments in developing policies aimed at enhancing the role of government auditors in detecting fraud. Keywords: government auditors, professional skepticism, attribution, workload compression","PeriodicalId":41923,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/apmaj.v16i3-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of professional scepticism, competence, and workload compression on an auditor's ability to detect potential fraud. This sample consisted of 149 government auditors from the Indonesian Local Government Inspectorate. Data was gathered through the use of a questionnaire and analysed using the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. The findings revealed that internal attribution (professional scepticism and competency) have a significant impact on an auditor's ability to detect the possibility of fraud. Workload compression as an external attribution, did not have a meaningful influence on an auditor's ability to detect probable fraud. Workload reduction was also found to be ineffective in moderating the relationship between internal attribution and an auditor's ability to detect probable fraud. The findings can guide local governments in developing policies aimed at enhancing the role of government auditors in detecting fraud. Keywords: government auditors, professional skepticism, attribution, workload compression
专业怀疑论、能力和工作量压缩对政府审计师发现可能欺诈能力的影响
本研究的目的是调查职业怀疑、能力和工作量压缩对审计师发现潜在欺诈的能力的影响。该样本由来自印度尼西亚地方政府监察局的149名政府审计员组成。通过使用问卷收集数据,并使用偏最小二乘结构方程建模进行分析。调查结果显示,内部归因(职业怀疑和能力)对审计师发现欺诈可能性的能力有重大影响。工作量压缩作为一种外部归因,对审计师检测可能的欺诈行为的能力没有产生有意义的影响。减少工作量也被发现在调节内部归因与审计师发现可能欺诈的能力之间的关系方面无效。调查结果可以指导地方政府制定旨在加强政府审计员在发现欺诈行为方面的作用的政策。关键词:政府审计师、职业怀疑论、归因、工作量压缩
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信