Central government property asset management: a review of international changes

IF 2.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT
O. Kaganova, Judith Meira Amoils
{"title":"Central government property asset management: a review of international changes","authors":"O. Kaganova, Judith Meira Amoils","doi":"10.1108/jcre-09-2019-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is shortage of global research on asset management (AM) by various central governments. This paper aims at reducing this gap.,This general review is based on literature, published government documents, agendas of specialized membership organizations (considered through the qualitative thematic analysis) and the authors’ experiences in advising governments on AM in 30 countries. The study focuses on three topics of recurrent interest among governments and AM experts: drivers of change and response trends; organizational models and attributes of good governance at public AM organizations. It also discusses whether the examined practices conform with New Public Management (NPM).,The paper identifies five key international drivers of change: austerity measures; an increased focus on performance management; changes in political and ideological agendas; technology and business operations changes; and the environmental sustainability agenda. It analyses response trends to these drivers, both positive and negative. Five dimensions of organizational settings that are important for AM are identified, demonstrating the great diversity of practices. The paper outlines governance elements specific to government AM and illustrates related challenges. It also shows that while current AM typically conforms with NPM, there are notable deviations, such as low corporatization and recentralization of AM.,This paper is a broad review; in-depth study of specific aspects is left for further research.,The paper introduces new empirical knowledge about AM approaches at central governments into research discourse, with a broad thematic coverage not achieved before; contributes to the discussion of some hot underexplored topics; hypothesizes why current AM practices deviate from NPM doctrines; and provides unique insights for AM practitioners.","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jcre-09-2019-0038","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-09-2019-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

There is shortage of global research on asset management (AM) by various central governments. This paper aims at reducing this gap.,This general review is based on literature, published government documents, agendas of specialized membership organizations (considered through the qualitative thematic analysis) and the authors’ experiences in advising governments on AM in 30 countries. The study focuses on three topics of recurrent interest among governments and AM experts: drivers of change and response trends; organizational models and attributes of good governance at public AM organizations. It also discusses whether the examined practices conform with New Public Management (NPM).,The paper identifies five key international drivers of change: austerity measures; an increased focus on performance management; changes in political and ideological agendas; technology and business operations changes; and the environmental sustainability agenda. It analyses response trends to these drivers, both positive and negative. Five dimensions of organizational settings that are important for AM are identified, demonstrating the great diversity of practices. The paper outlines governance elements specific to government AM and illustrates related challenges. It also shows that while current AM typically conforms with NPM, there are notable deviations, such as low corporatization and recentralization of AM.,This paper is a broad review; in-depth study of specific aspects is left for further research.,The paper introduces new empirical knowledge about AM approaches at central governments into research discourse, with a broad thematic coverage not achieved before; contributes to the discussion of some hot underexplored topics; hypothesizes why current AM practices deviate from NPM doctrines; and provides unique insights for AM practitioners.
中央政府财产资产管理:国际变化的回顾
各国中央政府缺乏对资产管理的全球研究。本文旨在缩小这一差距。,本综述基于文献、已发表的政府文件、专门成员组织的议程(通过定性专题分析进行考虑)以及作者在30个国家就AM向政府提供咨询的经验。该研究侧重于政府和AM专家经常感兴趣的三个主题:变革的驱动因素和应对趋势;公共AM组织良好治理的组织模式和属性。它还讨论了被审查的实践是否符合新公共管理(NPM)。,该文件确定了变革的五个关键国际驱动因素:紧缩措施;更加注重业绩管理;政治和意识形态议程的变化;技术和业务运营变化;以及环境可持续性议程。它分析了对这些驱动因素的反应趋势,包括积极的和消极的。确定了对AM重要的组织环境的五个维度,表明了实践的巨大多样性。本文概述了政府AM特有的治理要素,并说明了相关挑战。研究还表明,虽然目前的AM通常符合NPM,但也存在显著的偏差,如AM的公司化程度较低和重新集中;具体方面的深入研究还有待进一步研究。,本文将关于中央政府AM方法的新的实证知识引入到研究话语中,具有以前没有实现的广泛的主题覆盖;有助于讨论一些尚未充分探讨的热门话题;假设当前AM实践偏离NPM理论的原因;并为AM从业者提供独特的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信