Are cancer care pathways associated with longer waiting times. Analysing crowding out effects in radiology, pathology, and surgery

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING
O. Olsson
{"title":"Are cancer care pathways associated with longer waiting times. Analysing crowding out effects in radiology, pathology, and surgery","authors":"O. Olsson","doi":"10.1177/2053434520978173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction In 2015, Sweden initiated the implementation of standardised cancer care pathways (CCPs). With short, nationally imposed target times from diagnosis to first treatment, the issue of crowding out effects has been debated. This study investigate whether the implementation of CCPs is associated with longer waiting times for surgery, radiology scans and pathology analyses for other patient groups. Methods Data from the internal computer systems used in radiology, pathology and surgery to plan and follow the production at a county hospital in Sweden during 2014–2017 were analysed. By utilising the different priority categories used in these specialties, changes in waiting times before and after the implementation of CCPs could be analysed. Results The results are consistent with an association between the implementation of CCPs and longer waiting times for the priority category prioritised immediately after the CCP category in all specialties. In addition, none of the lowest priority categories within each subspecialty have experienced increased waiting times after CCP implementation. Discussion These results are consistent with a change in prioritisation where CCP patients are receiving shorter waiting times after CCP implementation at the expense of other patient groups. Crowding out effects related to CCP implementation have not been previously researched. This study therefore fills a gap in present literature. With an increased awareness of these challenges, and a more holistic perspective in the implementation process, actions can be put in place to identify and counteract crowding out effects.","PeriodicalId":43751,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care Coordination","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2053434520978173","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care Coordination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2053434520978173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction In 2015, Sweden initiated the implementation of standardised cancer care pathways (CCPs). With short, nationally imposed target times from diagnosis to first treatment, the issue of crowding out effects has been debated. This study investigate whether the implementation of CCPs is associated with longer waiting times for surgery, radiology scans and pathology analyses for other patient groups. Methods Data from the internal computer systems used in radiology, pathology and surgery to plan and follow the production at a county hospital in Sweden during 2014–2017 were analysed. By utilising the different priority categories used in these specialties, changes in waiting times before and after the implementation of CCPs could be analysed. Results The results are consistent with an association between the implementation of CCPs and longer waiting times for the priority category prioritised immediately after the CCP category in all specialties. In addition, none of the lowest priority categories within each subspecialty have experienced increased waiting times after CCP implementation. Discussion These results are consistent with a change in prioritisation where CCP patients are receiving shorter waiting times after CCP implementation at the expense of other patient groups. Crowding out effects related to CCP implementation have not been previously researched. This study therefore fills a gap in present literature. With an increased awareness of these challenges, and a more holistic perspective in the implementation process, actions can be put in place to identify and counteract crowding out effects.
癌症治疗途径是否与更长的等待时间有关?分析放射学、病理学和外科的挤出效应
简介2015年,瑞典开始实施标准化的癌症治疗途径(CCPs)。从诊断到第一次治疗,国家规定的目标时间很短,因此挤出效应的问题一直存在争议。本研究调查了CCP的实施是否与其他患者群体的手术、放射学扫描和病理学分析等待时间更长有关。方法分析2014-2017年瑞典一家县医院用于放射学、病理学和外科手术的内部计算机系统的数据,以计划和跟踪生产。通过利用这些专业中使用的不同优先级类别,可以分析CCP实施前后等待时间的变化。结果结果与CCP的实施与所有专业中紧接在CCP类别之后的优先类别的等待时间之间的关联一致。此外,在CCP实施后,每个子专业中没有一个优先级最低的类别的等待时间增加。讨论这些结果与优先级的变化一致,即CCP患者在CCP实施后等待时间缩短,而牺牲了其他患者群体。与CCP实施相关的排挤效应以前没有研究过。因此,本研究填补了现有文献的空白。随着对这些挑战的认识的提高,以及执行过程中更全面的视角,可以采取行动来识别和抵消挤出效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Care Coordination (formerly published as the International Journal of Care Pathways) provides an international forum for the latest scientific research in care coordination. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles which describe basic research to a multidisciplinary field as well as other broader approaches and strategies hypothesized to improve care coordination. The Journal offers insightful overviews and reflections on innovation, underlying issues, and thought provoking opinion pieces in related fields. Articles from multidisciplinary fields are welcomed from leading health care academics and policy-makers. Published articles types include original research, reviews, guidelines papers, book reviews, and news items.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信