Plátano's Pharmacy: The Republic's Taste of its Own Medicine

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION
José Ángel Maldonado
{"title":"Plátano's Pharmacy: The Republic's Taste of its Own Medicine","authors":"José Ángel Maldonado","doi":"10.14321/rhetpublaffa.25.3.0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:On January 6, 2021, supporters of Donald Trump stormed the US Capitol, demanding the head of Vice-President Mike Pence while challenging the results of a fair presidential election. Amid the shock, US journalists—finding few words to describe the severity of the moment—dusted off the old term: \"banana republic.\" Banana republics are countries whose economy depends on the export of a finite natural resource, like bananas. By design, the ruling elites of banana republics work alongside foreign, multinational corporations to benefit from the republic's human labor. Banana republics are typically governed by a military dictator appointed by a foreign power and elected through illegitimate elections. Notably, dictators ascend to power through military and/or populist violence, like coups d'état and magnicide. Among the reckonings that US Americans encountered the days following the riots was the idea that their country had been relegated beside those so-called \"banana republics.\" Indeed, the public display of violence brought about by a populist insurrection indicated a failure of the highest rank. In this essay, I ask: \"What are the implications of treating violence seriously as a rhetorical event?\" I suggest that referring to the United States as a \"banana republic\" due to populist violence against sacrosanct, democratic institutions requires that US Americans open themselves to the possibility of unexceptionalism, a recognition that—like a medicine—few are willing to stomach. I offer the idea that Donald Trump is the first Latin American president of the United States, and, in turn, that the United States has opened itself to a vulnerability whose damage is unknowable. To do so, I revisit two works by Jacques Derrida: Autoimmunity (2003), an interview where he describes the paradox of post-9/11 counterterrorist violence as autoimmunity, or, how organisms attack themselves in a quasi-suicidal fashion; and Plato's Pharmacy (1968), where he demonstrates an approach to unveiling the unseen ideological traces that haunt particular words. I ask: what is the unseen, terroristic force concealed by the claim that the United States is a banana republic? I explore the Capitol riots as a new \"major event\" (a televised moment playing on loop and accompanied by specific phrases), where a new type of terrorist uses state-sanctioned freedoms to inflict violence upon itself. I then draw from Chilean poets to provide scholars a lesson on the role of violence in the forming of national identity.","PeriodicalId":45013,"journal":{"name":"Rhetoric & Public Affairs","volume":"25 1","pages":"75 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhetoric & Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.25.3.0075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:On January 6, 2021, supporters of Donald Trump stormed the US Capitol, demanding the head of Vice-President Mike Pence while challenging the results of a fair presidential election. Amid the shock, US journalists—finding few words to describe the severity of the moment—dusted off the old term: "banana republic." Banana republics are countries whose economy depends on the export of a finite natural resource, like bananas. By design, the ruling elites of banana republics work alongside foreign, multinational corporations to benefit from the republic's human labor. Banana republics are typically governed by a military dictator appointed by a foreign power and elected through illegitimate elections. Notably, dictators ascend to power through military and/or populist violence, like coups d'état and magnicide. Among the reckonings that US Americans encountered the days following the riots was the idea that their country had been relegated beside those so-called "banana republics." Indeed, the public display of violence brought about by a populist insurrection indicated a failure of the highest rank. In this essay, I ask: "What are the implications of treating violence seriously as a rhetorical event?" I suggest that referring to the United States as a "banana republic" due to populist violence against sacrosanct, democratic institutions requires that US Americans open themselves to the possibility of unexceptionalism, a recognition that—like a medicine—few are willing to stomach. I offer the idea that Donald Trump is the first Latin American president of the United States, and, in turn, that the United States has opened itself to a vulnerability whose damage is unknowable. To do so, I revisit two works by Jacques Derrida: Autoimmunity (2003), an interview where he describes the paradox of post-9/11 counterterrorist violence as autoimmunity, or, how organisms attack themselves in a quasi-suicidal fashion; and Plato's Pharmacy (1968), where he demonstrates an approach to unveiling the unseen ideological traces that haunt particular words. I ask: what is the unseen, terroristic force concealed by the claim that the United States is a banana republic? I explore the Capitol riots as a new "major event" (a televised moment playing on loop and accompanied by specific phrases), where a new type of terrorist uses state-sanctioned freedoms to inflict violence upon itself. I then draw from Chilean poets to provide scholars a lesson on the role of violence in the forming of national identity.
普拉塔诺的药房:共和国对自己药物的品味
摘要:2021年1月6日,唐纳德·特朗普的支持者冲进美国国会大厦,要求副总统迈克·彭斯下台,同时挑战公平的总统选举结果。在震惊中,美国记者们——找不到什么词来形容这一时刻的严重性——重新使用了“香蕉共和国”这个旧词。香蕉共和国是指经济依赖于香蕉等有限自然资源出口的国家。香蕉共和国的统治精英们有意与外国跨国公司合作,从共和国的人力劳动中获益。香蕉共和国通常由外国势力任命的军事独裁者统治,并通过非法选举产生。值得注意的是,独裁者通过军事和/或民粹主义暴力,如政变和大屠杀,获得权力。在骚乱之后的日子里,美国人遇到的一种看法是,他们的国家已经被降级到那些所谓的“香蕉共和国”旁边。事实上,民粹主义起义所带来的公开暴力表明了最高阶层的失败。在这篇文章中,我问:“把暴力作为一个修辞事件认真对待意味着什么?”我认为,由于民粹主义对神圣的民主制度的暴力而将美国称为“香蕉共和国”,需要美国人开放自己,接受不例外主义的可能性,这种认识就像药物一样,很少有人愿意接受。我的想法是,唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)是美国的第一位拉美总统,反过来,美国已经向一个脆弱性敞开了大门,其损害是不可知的。为此,我重温了雅克·德里达的两部作品:《自身免疫》(2003),在一次采访中,他将后9/11反恐暴力的悖论描述为自身免疫,或者说,生物体如何以一种类似自杀的方式攻击自己;以及柏拉图的《药房》(1968),在这本书中,他展示了一种方法,揭示了困扰特定词汇的看不见的意识形态痕迹。我问:美国是一个香蕉共和国的说法所隐藏的看不见的恐怖主义力量是什么?我把国会大厦骚乱作为一个新的“重大事件”(电视上循环播放的时刻,伴随着特定的短语),一种新型的恐怖分子利用国家批准的自由对自己施加暴力。然后,我从智利诗人的作品中为学者们提供了一个关于暴力在形成国家认同中的作用的教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rhetoric & Public Affairs
Rhetoric & Public Affairs COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信