Les analyses médico-légales de salives: expertise vis-à-vis l'analyse des drogues

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, LEGAL
A. Doyon, Laurence Paradis-Tanguay, F. Crispino, A. Lajeunesse
{"title":"Les analyses médico-légales de salives: expertise vis-à-vis l'analyse des drogues","authors":"A. Doyon, Laurence Paradis-Tanguay, F. Crispino, A. Lajeunesse","doi":"10.1080/00085030.2017.1303254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT When intercepting an individual on the road for driving under the influence of drugs (DUID), urine and blood are currently the main biological matrices used for screening. The intimate or invasive character of these biological specimens is undoubtedly a major disadvantage during the collection of specimens. Over the past decades, saliva has turned out to be an interesting alternative matrix. Thus, saliva is already used in several countries for screening prevalent drugs such as amphetamines, 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA), cocaine, cannabis, opiates and benzodiazepines. Despite many benefits reported with saliva analyses, the establishment of a good correlation between salivary and plasmatic levels remains a challenge in interpreting toxicological results. Can saliva become an alternative to the usual biological matrices and/or a complement in cases of drug-impaired driving? A critical analysis with Bayesian treatments of data is addressed through this article in order to promote a reflection on this proposed drug screening methodology.","PeriodicalId":44383,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal","volume":"50 1","pages":"102 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00085030.2017.1303254","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00085030.2017.1303254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT When intercepting an individual on the road for driving under the influence of drugs (DUID), urine and blood are currently the main biological matrices used for screening. The intimate or invasive character of these biological specimens is undoubtedly a major disadvantage during the collection of specimens. Over the past decades, saliva has turned out to be an interesting alternative matrix. Thus, saliva is already used in several countries for screening prevalent drugs such as amphetamines, 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA), cocaine, cannabis, opiates and benzodiazepines. Despite many benefits reported with saliva analyses, the establishment of a good correlation between salivary and plasmatic levels remains a challenge in interpreting toxicological results. Can saliva become an alternative to the usual biological matrices and/or a complement in cases of drug-impaired driving? A critical analysis with Bayesian treatments of data is addressed through this article in order to promote a reflection on this proposed drug screening methodology.
唾液的法医分析:药物分析方面的专业知识
摘要当在道路上拦截受药物影响驾驶的个人时,尿液和血液是目前用于筛查的主要生物基质。这些生物标本的亲密或侵入性无疑是标本采集过程中的一个主要缺点。在过去的几十年里,唾液已经成为一种有趣的替代基质。因此,唾液已经在几个国家用于筛查流行药物,如苯丙胺、3,4-亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺、可卡因、大麻、阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物。尽管唾液分析报告了许多益处,但在解释毒理学结果时,唾液和血浆水平之间建立良好的相关性仍然是一个挑战。在药物受损驾驶的情况下,唾液能否成为常用生物基质的替代品和/或补体?本文对数据进行了贝叶斯处理的批判性分析,以促进对这一拟议药物筛选方法的反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信