Ethical Assumptions and Implications of Hermeneutic Practice as Practical Wisdom

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
L. Rohden
{"title":"Ethical Assumptions and Implications of Hermeneutic Practice as Practical Wisdom","authors":"L. Rohden","doi":"10.5195/errs.2019.431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this paper is to justify the view that hermeneutical practice as a philosophical proposal cannot be reduced to the extraction of hidden meanings or the explication of text structures but instead contains ethical assumptions and implications. Following Ricœur’s work, I will show that literary texts are part of ethics insofar as they create different mental experiments about ideas and values. I will show that the interpretation of literary texts, woven by the free play of imagination, constitutes a practice in which readers have the possibility of reconfiguring their way of looking at the world and acting. The reading of literature is an exercise of practical wisdom by enabling readers to rehearse and enable the implementation of the good life in just institutions. To achieve the paper’s goal, I initially discuss ethical assumptions present in literary texts. I then develop Ricœur’s notion of hermeneutics as used for the interpretation of literature. Finally, I propose several ethical implications resulting from the hermeneutical practice that is related to literary texts.","PeriodicalId":51981,"journal":{"name":"Etudes Ricoeuriennes-Ricoeur Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"5-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etudes Ricoeuriennes-Ricoeur Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2019.431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to justify the view that hermeneutical practice as a philosophical proposal cannot be reduced to the extraction of hidden meanings or the explication of text structures but instead contains ethical assumptions and implications. Following Ricœur’s work, I will show that literary texts are part of ethics insofar as they create different mental experiments about ideas and values. I will show that the interpretation of literary texts, woven by the free play of imagination, constitutes a practice in which readers have the possibility of reconfiguring their way of looking at the world and acting. The reading of literature is an exercise of practical wisdom by enabling readers to rehearse and enable the implementation of the good life in just institutions. To achieve the paper’s goal, I initially discuss ethical assumptions present in literary texts. I then develop Ricœur’s notion of hermeneutics as used for the interpretation of literature. Finally, I propose several ethical implications resulting from the hermeneutical practice that is related to literary texts.
解释学实践作为实践智慧的伦理假设及其启示
本文的目的是证明这样一种观点,即解释学实践作为一种哲学建议,不能简化为对隐含含义的提取或对文本结构的解释,而是包含伦理假设和含义。在Ricœur的作品之后,我将展示文学文本是伦理学的一部分,因为它们创造了关于思想和价值观的不同心理实验。我将展示,由想象力的自由发挥编织而成的对文学文本的解读,构成了一种实践,在这种实践中,读者有可能重新配置他们看待世界和行为的方式。文学阅读是一种实践智慧的锻炼,使读者能够排练并在公正的机构中实现美好生活。为了达到本文的目的,我首先讨论了文学文本中存在的伦理假设。然后,我发展了Ricœur的解释学概念,用于解释文学。最后,我提出了与文学文本相关的解释学实践所产生的几个伦理启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Etudes Ricoeuriennes-Ricoeur Studies
Etudes Ricoeuriennes-Ricoeur Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信