Understanding the Enigma of Putin's Russia

IF 1.3
Asia Policy Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1353/asp.2022.0044
Christopher R. Miller
{"title":"Understanding the Enigma of Putin's Russia","authors":"Christopher R. Miller","doi":"10.1353/asp.2022.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"S everal months into the latest phase of the Russia-Ukraine War, it may seem like a strange time to refer to Russian president Vladimir Putin or his system of governance as “weak.” It certainly does not feel that way on the frontlines of Donbas as Russia brings to bear all its conventional might in a war of conquest, the type of conflict many analysts thought had gone out of fashion in Europe after the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. If you had asked Russia watchers in the summer of 2021 about the likelihood of over 100,000 Russian soldiers marching into Ukraine, most would have seen the scenario as far-fetched. The entire field of Russian studies deserves tough questions about the adequacy of its methods for understanding Russian politics. If anyone has a credible claim to understand and explain Russian politics, though, it is Timothy Frye, who is arguably the leading figure in a new school of political science research that seeks to elucidate the inner logics of the Russian political system. Alongside numerous coauthors and former students, Frye’s research has examined topics such as the significance of Russian elections, public opinion, lobbying and corruption, and property rights and the rule of law. Weak Strongman: The Limits of Power in Putin’s Russia is Frye’s brilliant distillation of nearly 30 years of research on these themes. Despite this new wave of research about how Russia’s political system works, as Frye notes, there is a long history of relying on tropes rather than analysis in the field of Russian studies. It isn’t only Westerners like Churchill who have seen Russia as a land of riddles and enigmas; Russians’ analyses of their own country’s politics frequently rely on references to the country’s supposedly unique history, culture, or spirituality. Frye asks his readers to situate contemporary Russia not in the context of Ivan the Terrible or Leo Tolstoy but in that of other contemporary authoritarian states, ranging from Recep Erdogan’s Turkey to Viktor Orban’s Hungary to Nicolás Maduro’s Venezuela. As Weak Strongman shows, not everything about Russia is enigmatic. And despite his strongman image, Putin has an ability to control the Russian political system and state apparatus that is more circumscribed than it often appears.","PeriodicalId":53442,"journal":{"name":"Asia Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2022.0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

S everal months into the latest phase of the Russia-Ukraine War, it may seem like a strange time to refer to Russian president Vladimir Putin or his system of governance as “weak.” It certainly does not feel that way on the frontlines of Donbas as Russia brings to bear all its conventional might in a war of conquest, the type of conflict many analysts thought had gone out of fashion in Europe after the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. If you had asked Russia watchers in the summer of 2021 about the likelihood of over 100,000 Russian soldiers marching into Ukraine, most would have seen the scenario as far-fetched. The entire field of Russian studies deserves tough questions about the adequacy of its methods for understanding Russian politics. If anyone has a credible claim to understand and explain Russian politics, though, it is Timothy Frye, who is arguably the leading figure in a new school of political science research that seeks to elucidate the inner logics of the Russian political system. Alongside numerous coauthors and former students, Frye’s research has examined topics such as the significance of Russian elections, public opinion, lobbying and corruption, and property rights and the rule of law. Weak Strongman: The Limits of Power in Putin’s Russia is Frye’s brilliant distillation of nearly 30 years of research on these themes. Despite this new wave of research about how Russia’s political system works, as Frye notes, there is a long history of relying on tropes rather than analysis in the field of Russian studies. It isn’t only Westerners like Churchill who have seen Russia as a land of riddles and enigmas; Russians’ analyses of their own country’s politics frequently rely on references to the country’s supposedly unique history, culture, or spirituality. Frye asks his readers to situate contemporary Russia not in the context of Ivan the Terrible or Leo Tolstoy but in that of other contemporary authoritarian states, ranging from Recep Erdogan’s Turkey to Viktor Orban’s Hungary to Nicolás Maduro’s Venezuela. As Weak Strongman shows, not everything about Russia is enigmatic. And despite his strongman image, Putin has an ability to control the Russian political system and state apparatus that is more circumscribed than it often appears.
解读普京治下的俄罗斯之谜
在俄乌战争最新阶段的几个月里,把俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔·普京或他的治理体系称为“软弱”似乎是一个奇怪的时刻。在顿巴斯前线,俄罗斯在征服战争中承担了其所有常规力量,当然不会有这种感觉,许多分析人士认为,在《莫洛托夫-里宾特洛甫条约》之后,这种冲突在欧洲已经过时。如果你在2021年夏天询问俄罗斯观察家,超过10万名俄罗斯士兵进军乌克兰的可能性,大多数人会认为这种情况很牵强。整个俄罗斯研究领域都值得质疑其理解俄罗斯政治的方法是否充分。然而,如果有人有可信的说法来理解和解释俄罗斯政治,那就是蒂莫西·弗莱,他可以说是一个新的政治学研究学派的领军人物,该学派试图阐明俄罗斯政治体系的内部逻辑。弗莱的研究与众多合著者和前学生一起,探讨了俄罗斯选举的意义、公众舆论、游说和腐败、产权和法治等主题。《软弱的强人:普京统治下的俄罗斯的权力极限》是弗莱对这些主题近30年研究的精彩提炼。正如弗莱所指出的,尽管有关于俄罗斯政治制度如何运作的新一轮研究浪潮,但在俄罗斯研究领域,依赖比喻而非分析的历史由来已久。不仅仅是像丘吉尔这样的西方人把俄罗斯视为一个充满谜和谜的国度;俄罗斯人对本国政治的分析经常依赖于对该国所谓独特的历史、文化或精神的引用。弗莱要求他的读者不要把当代俄罗斯放在可怕的伊万或列夫·托尔斯泰的背景下,而是放在其他当代威权国家的背景下——从雷杰普·埃尔多安的土耳其到维克托·欧尔班的匈牙利,再到尼古拉斯·马杜罗的委内瑞拉。正如《弱强人》所展示的那样,并非俄罗斯的一切都是谜一样的。尽管普京有着强人的形象,但他有能力控制俄罗斯的政治体系和国家机构,而这比通常看起来更为有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Policy
Asia Policy Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Asia Policy is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal presenting policy-relevant academic research on the Asia-Pacific that draws clear and concise conclusions useful to today’s policymakers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信