Mont Blanc Imagined: Poetry, Science and the Prospect-View in Davy and Coleridge

IF 0.3 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Romanticism Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.3366/rom.2023.0577
Tim Fulford
{"title":"Mont Blanc Imagined: Poetry, Science and the Prospect-View in Davy and Coleridge","authors":"Tim Fulford","doi":"10.3366/rom.2023.0577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My discussion of Davy intervenes in several critical debates about Romantic literature and science. First, I show that for Davy, ‘literature’ and science were neither inimical nor even merely analogous disciplines. Poetry was not simply related to scientific discourse because both expressed the enquirer’s understanding of nature; it was formally related to experimental enquiry as a formulation on paper of the mental organization of the world-as-apprehended that is both akin to and a preparation for the mental organization of the world-as-apprehended that takes form as experimental design. Second, Davy’s poetry, developing Coleridge’s, constitutes a development of the prospect-view tradition in that it is as concerned with the mental process of prospecting as it is with the object viewed. In this respect, it is a modification of the materialist account of perception of the medical and scientific men who set the agenda of the Bristol circle in which both Coleridge and Davy first flourished – Erasmus Darwin and Darwin’s main advocate, their mentor Thomas Beddoes.","PeriodicalId":42939,"journal":{"name":"Romanticism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/rom.2023.0577","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

My discussion of Davy intervenes in several critical debates about Romantic literature and science. First, I show that for Davy, ‘literature’ and science were neither inimical nor even merely analogous disciplines. Poetry was not simply related to scientific discourse because both expressed the enquirer’s understanding of nature; it was formally related to experimental enquiry as a formulation on paper of the mental organization of the world-as-apprehended that is both akin to and a preparation for the mental organization of the world-as-apprehended that takes form as experimental design. Second, Davy’s poetry, developing Coleridge’s, constitutes a development of the prospect-view tradition in that it is as concerned with the mental process of prospecting as it is with the object viewed. In this respect, it is a modification of the materialist account of perception of the medical and scientific men who set the agenda of the Bristol circle in which both Coleridge and Davy first flourished – Erasmus Darwin and Darwin’s main advocate, their mentor Thomas Beddoes.
想象中的勃朗峰:戴维与柯勒律治的诗歌、科学与远景
我对戴维的讨论介入了一些关于浪漫主义文学和科学的批判性辩论。首先,我表明,对戴维来说,“文学”和科学既不是敌对的学科,甚至也不是类似的学科。诗歌不仅仅与科学话语相关,因为两者都表达了调查者对自然的理解;在形式上,它与实验探究有关,作为被理解世界的心理组织在纸上的表述,它既类似于被理解世界的心理组织,又为以实验设计的形式出现的被理解世界的心理组织做准备。其次,戴维的诗歌,发展了柯勒律治的诗歌,构成了展望观传统的发展,因为它既关注观察对象,也关注观察对象的心理过程。在这方面,这是唯物主义对医学和科学人物的看法的修正,这些人设定了布里斯托尔圈子的议程,柯勒律治和戴维都在这个圈子里首次繁荣起来——伊拉斯谟·达尔文和达尔文的主要倡导者,他们的导师托马斯·贝多斯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Romanticism
Romanticism LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The most distinguished scholarly journal of its kind edited and published in Britain, Romanticism offers a forum for the flourishing diversity of Romantic studies today. Focusing on the period 1750-1850, it publishes critical, historical, textual and bibliographical essays prepared to the highest scholarly standards, reflecting the full range of current methodological and theoretical debate. With an extensive reviews section, Romanticism constitutes a vital international arena for scholarly debate in this liveliest field of literary studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信