{"title":"The Power of Persuasion. Rhetoric, Common Judgment and Machiavelli in Hobbes","authors":"Guido Frilli","doi":"10.6092/ISSN.1825-9618/9615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I explore the elusive function of rhetoric as a means to political pacification. With particular reference to Hobbes’s doctrine of the prophetic foundation of commonwealths, I contend that public persuasion, while being in most cases subversive and harmful, can sometimes cultivate men and make them more sociable. I purport thereby to qualify Hobbes’s denunciation of the seditious character of persuasion, and to question his alleged depreciation of common judgment as intrinsically gullible and passive. I argue in conclusion that there is more continuity on this score between Hobbes and Machiavelli than usually acknowledged, but also that this affinity threatens the unity of Hobbes’s argument.","PeriodicalId":41532,"journal":{"name":"Scienza & Politica-Per una Storia delle Dottrine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scienza & Politica-Per una Storia delle Dottrine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1825-9618/9615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article, I explore the elusive function of rhetoric as a means to political pacification. With particular reference to Hobbes’s doctrine of the prophetic foundation of commonwealths, I contend that public persuasion, while being in most cases subversive and harmful, can sometimes cultivate men and make them more sociable. I purport thereby to qualify Hobbes’s denunciation of the seditious character of persuasion, and to question his alleged depreciation of common judgment as intrinsically gullible and passive. I argue in conclusion that there is more continuity on this score between Hobbes and Machiavelli than usually acknowledged, but also that this affinity threatens the unity of Hobbes’s argument.