Securitisation theory and the securitised university: Europe and the nascent colonisation of global intellectual capital

Q3 Social Sciences
L. Gearon
{"title":"Securitisation theory and the securitised university: Europe and the nascent colonisation of global intellectual capital","authors":"L. Gearon","doi":"10.4102/THE.V4I0.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:  This article explores the increasing prevalence of security themes in higher education policy. Aim:  Addressing neglect in security studies on the role of the university in the processes of securitisation, this article shows the integral relationship between securitisation theory and the securitised university. Setting:  Drawing on exemplars from European higher education, the article argues that this complex epistemological transformation is part of a new and as yet little understood new colonisation of global intellectual capital. Methods:  The argument is in three stages: (1) that securitisation theory can account for the emergence of the securitised university; (2) that this securitisation of universities is integral to the political process of Europeanisation; and (3) that from this European context we may glimpse a nascent colonisation of global intellectual capital. Results:  This analysis of securitisation has, therefore, deep if as yet little explored epistemological implications for the transformation of universities worldwide, particularly because of this epistemological dimension, a  de facto  securitisation of knowledge. Conclusion:  This article concludes that these transformations are also important if at present neglected element to historic and contemporary debates on decolonising the curriculum, which frequently highlight the postcolonial relations and culturally still powerful relations between continents, for example between Europe and Africa.","PeriodicalId":32132,"journal":{"name":"Transformation in Higher Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4102/THE.V4I0.70","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transformation in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/THE.V4I0.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background:  This article explores the increasing prevalence of security themes in higher education policy. Aim:  Addressing neglect in security studies on the role of the university in the processes of securitisation, this article shows the integral relationship between securitisation theory and the securitised university. Setting:  Drawing on exemplars from European higher education, the article argues that this complex epistemological transformation is part of a new and as yet little understood new colonisation of global intellectual capital. Methods:  The argument is in three stages: (1) that securitisation theory can account for the emergence of the securitised university; (2) that this securitisation of universities is integral to the political process of Europeanisation; and (3) that from this European context we may glimpse a nascent colonisation of global intellectual capital. Results:  This analysis of securitisation has, therefore, deep if as yet little explored epistemological implications for the transformation of universities worldwide, particularly because of this epistemological dimension, a  de facto  securitisation of knowledge. Conclusion:  This article concludes that these transformations are also important if at present neglected element to historic and contemporary debates on decolonising the curriculum, which frequently highlight the postcolonial relations and culturally still powerful relations between continents, for example between Europe and Africa.
证券化理论与证券化大学:欧洲与全球知识资本的新生殖民
背景:本文探讨了高等教育政策中安全主题日益普遍的问题。目的:针对证券化研究中对大学在证券化过程中作用的忽视,本文展示了证券化理论与证券化大学之间的内在联系。背景:文章借鉴了欧洲高等教育的例子,认为这种复杂的认识论转变是全球知识资本新的、迄今为止鲜为人知的新殖民的一部分。方法:论证分为三个阶段:(1)证券化理论可以解释证券化大学的产生;(2) 这种大学证券化是欧洲化政治进程的组成部分;以及(3)从这种欧洲背景下,我们可能会看到全球知识资本的新生殖民。结果:因此,这种对证券化的分析对世界各地大学转型的认识论意义有着深刻的探索,尽管迄今为止很少探索,特别是因为这种认识论维度,即事实上的知识证券化。结论:这篇文章的结论是,这些转变也很重要,尽管目前被忽视了关于课程非殖民化的历史和当代辩论的元素,这些辩论经常强调后殖民关系和各大洲之间的文化上仍然强大的关系,例如欧洲和非洲之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transformation in Higher Education
Transformation in Higher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信