The Conquests of Adrianople by the Turks: Reflections on the Ottoman Expansion in Thrace

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Samet Budak
{"title":"The Conquests of Adrianople by the Turks: Reflections on the Ottoman Expansion in Thrace","authors":"Samet Budak","doi":"10.1515/islam-2022-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article is an attempt to construct a new approach to and narrative of early Ottoman conquests in Thrace in the 1360s and 1370s. It argues that the so-called second capital of the Ottomans, Adrianople (Edirne), was conquered three times through a detailed evaluation of known, neglected, or unknow sources. The second conquest was almost certainly by frontier lords who conquered the city for their own interests. At the same time, the article challenges the unilinear rise paradigm within the Ottoman studies. It showcases that, in the given period, the political arena between Ottomans, Byzantines, and other Turkish lords was open to various contingencies and dominated through constant negotiations among various parties. The practices of conquest, loss, and reconquest by those various parties determined the color of struggles not only in the case of Adrianople but also various other Thracian towns. The article finally sheds light on the role of a suppressed group of frontier lords who had their own political claims and agenda, betimes contrary to the Ottoman center. In the final analysis, this is an attempt to understand how new historical reconstructions may open up ways to conceptualize the political and social nature of the region in this period.","PeriodicalId":44652,"journal":{"name":"ISLAM-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GESCHICHTE UND KULTUR DES ISLAMISCHEN ORIENTS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISLAM-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GESCHICHTE UND KULTUR DES ISLAMISCHEN ORIENTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/islam-2022-0020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article is an attempt to construct a new approach to and narrative of early Ottoman conquests in Thrace in the 1360s and 1370s. It argues that the so-called second capital of the Ottomans, Adrianople (Edirne), was conquered three times through a detailed evaluation of known, neglected, or unknow sources. The second conquest was almost certainly by frontier lords who conquered the city for their own interests. At the same time, the article challenges the unilinear rise paradigm within the Ottoman studies. It showcases that, in the given period, the political arena between Ottomans, Byzantines, and other Turkish lords was open to various contingencies and dominated through constant negotiations among various parties. The practices of conquest, loss, and reconquest by those various parties determined the color of struggles not only in the case of Adrianople but also various other Thracian towns. The article finally sheds light on the role of a suppressed group of frontier lords who had their own political claims and agenda, betimes contrary to the Ottoman center. In the final analysis, this is an attempt to understand how new historical reconstructions may open up ways to conceptualize the political and social nature of the region in this period.
土耳其人对阿德里安堡的征服:对奥斯曼帝国在色雷斯扩张的反思
摘要本文试图构建一种新的研究方法和叙事方式,探讨1360年代和1370年代早期奥斯曼帝国在色雷斯的征服。它认为所谓的奥斯曼人的第二首都,阿德里安堡(Edirne),是通过对已知的、被忽视的或未知的资料的详细评估而三次被征服的。第二次征服几乎肯定是边境领主为了自己的利益而征服了这座城市。同时,本文也对奥斯曼帝国研究中的线性崛起范式提出了挑战。它表明,在特定时期,奥斯曼人,拜占庭人和其他土耳其领主之间的政治舞台对各种突发事件是开放的,并通过各方之间不断的谈判来主导。这些不同派别的征服、失败和再征服的做法决定了斗争的色彩,不仅在阿德里安堡的情况下,而且在其他色雷斯城镇也是如此。这篇文章最后揭示了一群被压制的边境领主的角色,他们有自己的政治主张和议程,有时与奥斯曼帝国中心背道而驰。归根结底,这是一种尝试,旨在理解新的历史重建如何为概念化这一时期该地区的政治和社会性质开辟途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信