Development of Students� Creativity through Learning Models in Physical Education during the Covid-19 Pandemic

IF 0.8 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Tite Juliantine, Reshandi Nugraha, Y. Yudiana, Ahmad Zaeri Sya'rani
{"title":"Development of Students� Creativity through Learning Models in Physical Education during the Covid-19 Pandemic","authors":"Tite Juliantine, Reshandi Nugraha, Y. Yudiana, Ahmad Zaeri Sya'rani","doi":"10.52547/aassjournal.1121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Physical education learning in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic has a remarkable impact on students' creativity. Objectives. This study aims to determine the effect of applying the inquiry and discovery models in online physical education learning to develop high school students' creativity. Methods. The multiple treatment and control with the pre and post-test procedure were used, while the samples were second-grade students in physical education learning of Senior High School in Bandung, consisting of 3 groups with 30 members each selected using random cluster sampling. The sample consists of 2 experimental and one control group. Experimental groups 1 and 2 received the inquiry and discovery learning model, respectively, while the control group received the conventional for 16 meetings each. Data collection was carried out by filling out a creativity questionnaire through a Google form before and after treatment. Results. The inquiry model has no difference in the average value of creativity compared to the discovery model's class (p=0.066). In contrast, the inquiry and discovery models have a different average creativity value than the class using the conventional/control model (p=0.001). Conclusions. There is no difference in increasing creativity between the inquiry and discovery models. Although the results of the Bonferroni test showed no difference in the mean value of invention in the inquiry model and the discovery model, when compared to the control group, the inquiry model was more effective.","PeriodicalId":43187,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Applied Sport Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Applied Sport Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/aassjournal.1121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background. Physical education learning in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic has a remarkable impact on students' creativity. Objectives. This study aims to determine the effect of applying the inquiry and discovery models in online physical education learning to develop high school students' creativity. Methods. The multiple treatment and control with the pre and post-test procedure were used, while the samples were second-grade students in physical education learning of Senior High School in Bandung, consisting of 3 groups with 30 members each selected using random cluster sampling. The sample consists of 2 experimental and one control group. Experimental groups 1 and 2 received the inquiry and discovery learning model, respectively, while the control group received the conventional for 16 meetings each. Data collection was carried out by filling out a creativity questionnaire through a Google form before and after treatment. Results. The inquiry model has no difference in the average value of creativity compared to the discovery model's class (p=0.066). In contrast, the inquiry and discovery models have a different average creativity value than the class using the conventional/control model (p=0.001). Conclusions. There is no difference in increasing creativity between the inquiry and discovery models. Although the results of the Bonferroni test showed no difference in the mean value of invention in the inquiry model and the discovery model, when compared to the control group, the inquiry model was more effective.
新冠肺炎疫情期间体育教学模式对学生创造力的培养
背景新冠肺炎疫情时代的体育学习对学生的创造力有着显著的影响。目标。本研究旨在确定在在线体育学习中应用探究和发现模式对培养高中生创造力的效果。方法。采用测试前和测试后的多重治疗和控制程序,样本为万隆高中体育学习的二年级学生,由3组组成,每组30人,采用随机整群抽样。样品由2个实验组和1个对照组组成。实验组1和2分别接受了询问和发现学习模型,而对照组分别接受了16次常规会议。数据收集是通过在治疗前后通过谷歌表格填写创造力问卷来进行的。后果与发现模型的类别相比,探究模型的创造力平均值没有差异(p=0.066)。相反,探究和发现模型的平均创造力值与使用传统/对照模型的类别不同(p=0.001)。结论。探究和发现模型在增加创造力方面没有区别。尽管Bonferroni测试的结果显示,询问模型和发现模型的发明平均值没有差异,但与对照组相比,询问模型更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Applied Sport Science
Annals of Applied Sport Science HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The editorial policy of The Annals of Applied Sport Science (Ann. Appl. Sport Sci.) follows the multi-disciplinary purposes of the sports science to promote the highest standards of scientific study referring to the following fields: • Sport Physiology and its related branches, • Sport Management and its related branches, • Kinesiology and Sport medicine and its related branches, • Sport Psychology and its related branches, • Motor Control and its related branches, • Sport Biomechanics and its related branches, • Sociology of Sport and its related branches, • History of Sport and its related branches, • Exercise, Training, Physical Activity and Health, • Physical Education and Learning. The emphasis of the journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined, and applied to sport and exercise that is defined inclusively to refer to all forms of human movement that aim to maintain or improve physical and mental well-being, create or improve social relationships, or obtain results in competition at all levels. The animal projects also can be evaluated with the decision of Editorial Boards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信