Book review: Interculturality between East and West: Unthink, dialogue, rethink

Q3 Social Sciences
Suhao Peng
{"title":"Book review: Interculturality between East and West: Unthink, dialogue, rethink","authors":"Suhao Peng","doi":"10.1177/2212585X221116374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Culture is one of the biggest concepts both in academia and on everyone’s lips in our daily life. For most of us, it has been taken-for-granted that cultures are divided by clear-cut Us-Them boundaries between countries, regions, religions, generations, among many others, manifesting a stark but ideologically imagined “boundary fetishism” (Pieterse, 2004, p. 224) that polarizes human beings between us/in-group and them/out-group. Interculturality is therefore confused with cross-national comparisons, for instance. This book Interculturality Between East and West: Unthink, Dialogue and Rethink urges us to question this taken-for-grantedness when we conceptualize culture and interculturality. By starting with a musician metaphor and some wellknown idioms, especially, the “众盲摸象 (The blind touching an elephant)” (Dervin et al., 2022, p. 5) encourages readers to ponder upon the nature of multiplicity of flavors (i.e., the underlying but hidden ideologies of ways of thinking) to open up pluri-perspectival discussions of interculturality in the beginning of this book. Overall, this book, like its title, is one of the very few works that are intercultural in nature by engaging the authors and their students into reciprocal and honest dialogues throughout the writing process when power relations are constantly (re)balanced in intercultural encounters. To challenge the long-held, dominant and (post-)modern paradigms of interculturality/intercultural research exclusively from the West, no rigid definitions of culture or of interculturality are given throughout the whole book; a posteriori logic is therefore favored. It is also important to note that, like many other critical scholars in intercultural fields (e.g., Holliday, 2011), the main idea of this book is neither to demonize nor to blow upWest/Westernization but to develop readers’ critical awareness of essentialist Othering/Otherization between superior Center and inferior Periphery when West and East meet each other; unquestioned and solid West-East binaries in this book are merely vivid cases for deepening and even reshaping our understandings","PeriodicalId":37881,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chinese Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2212585X221116374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Culture is one of the biggest concepts both in academia and on everyone’s lips in our daily life. For most of us, it has been taken-for-granted that cultures are divided by clear-cut Us-Them boundaries between countries, regions, religions, generations, among many others, manifesting a stark but ideologically imagined “boundary fetishism” (Pieterse, 2004, p. 224) that polarizes human beings between us/in-group and them/out-group. Interculturality is therefore confused with cross-national comparisons, for instance. This book Interculturality Between East and West: Unthink, Dialogue and Rethink urges us to question this taken-for-grantedness when we conceptualize culture and interculturality. By starting with a musician metaphor and some wellknown idioms, especially, the “众盲摸象 (The blind touching an elephant)” (Dervin et al., 2022, p. 5) encourages readers to ponder upon the nature of multiplicity of flavors (i.e., the underlying but hidden ideologies of ways of thinking) to open up pluri-perspectival discussions of interculturality in the beginning of this book. Overall, this book, like its title, is one of the very few works that are intercultural in nature by engaging the authors and their students into reciprocal and honest dialogues throughout the writing process when power relations are constantly (re)balanced in intercultural encounters. To challenge the long-held, dominant and (post-)modern paradigms of interculturality/intercultural research exclusively from the West, no rigid definitions of culture or of interculturality are given throughout the whole book; a posteriori logic is therefore favored. It is also important to note that, like many other critical scholars in intercultural fields (e.g., Holliday, 2011), the main idea of this book is neither to demonize nor to blow upWest/Westernization but to develop readers’ critical awareness of essentialist Othering/Otherization between superior Center and inferior Periphery when West and East meet each other; unquestioned and solid West-East binaries in this book are merely vivid cases for deepening and even reshaping our understandings
书评:东西方的跨文化:不思考,对话,重新思考
文化是学术界和我们日常生活中每个人口中最大的概念之一。对于我们大多数人来说,文化被国家、地区、宗教、世代等之间明确的“我们-他们”界限所分割,这是理所当然的,表现出一种鲜明的、但在意识形态上想象出来的“边界拜物教”(Pieterse, 2004, p. 224),使我们/群体内和他们/群体外之间的人类两极分化。例如,跨文化性就与跨国比较相混淆。《东西方文化间性:不思考、对话与反思》一书敦促我们在将文化和文化间性概念化时,对这种想当然的态度提出质疑。从一个音乐家的比喻和一些著名的成语开始,特别是“盲人摸大象”(德文等人,2022年,第5页),鼓励读者思考多种口味的本质(即,潜在的但隐藏的思维方式的意识形态),从而在本书的开头开启跨文化的多元视角讨论。总的来说,这本书就像它的标题一样,是为数不多的跨文化作品之一,在整个写作过程中,作者和学生们进行了互惠和诚实的对话,在跨文化接触中,权力关系不断(重新)平衡。为了挑战长期以来只来自西方的跨文化/跨文化研究的主导范式和(后)现代范式,全书没有给出文化或跨文化的严格定义;因此,后验逻辑更受青睐。同样重要的是要注意,像许多其他跨文化领域的批判性学者一样(例如,Holliday, 2011),本书的主要思想既不是妖魔化也不是抨击西方/西方化,而是培养读者在西方和东方相遇时对优越中心和劣等外围之间本质主义的他者化/他者化的批判意识;书中毫无疑问的、坚实的东西方二元对立仅仅是加深甚至重塑我们理解的生动案例
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Chinese Education
International Journal of Chinese Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Chinese Education (IJCE) is a result of the collaboration between Brill Academic Publishers and the Institute of Education at Tsinghua University. It aims to strengthen Chinese academic exchanges and cooperation with other countries in order to improve Chinese educational research and promote Chinese educational development. Through collaboration among scholars in and outside of China who are dedicated to the investigation of Chinese education, this journal aims to raise Chinese educational research levels, further recognize and solve Chinese educational problems, inform Chinese educational policies and decisions, and promote Chinese educational reform and development. This journal welcomes empirical as well as theoretical studies on particular educational issues and/or policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信