The International System: Economic and Science and Technological Perspectives

IF 0.7 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
S. Varma
{"title":"The International System: Economic and Science and Technological Perspectives","authors":"S. Varma","doi":"10.1080/09700161.2023.2188530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I T wo phenomenal developments characterized the change in the international system in the years after the Second World War: (i) the spread of Multinational Corporations (MNCs) and (ii) the rise of a Third World, with its pluralization of political systems, economic forms and social doctrines. While the former is an important factor in the North–South relationship, the latter development has brought about new changes in the international economic system. While not exercising any direct political power, the MNCs are economic giants, mostly belonging to the United States. The emergence of more than 500 MNCs has drastically changed the character of the international system, and while academics continue to discuss whether they are benevolent giants engaged in the task of abolishing poverty and creating a world community, or parasites preying upon the life-blood of the host country, they are spreading their economic tentacles. The MNCs have become the dominant actors in the international system, and several of them today exercise more collective influence than most of the nation states. However, it would be incorrect to regard American MNCs as a tool of American imperialism. They are quite capable of undertaking policies independently of the US Government. Nor are the MNCs completely independent actors, capable of pursuing objectives incompatible with the US national interest. The US Government and the American MNCs function independently of each other, though occasionally the former adopts policies and positions in the field of international relations, which suit the interests of MNCs. In spite of a plurality of States replacing bipolarity in the political field, economic power continues to emanate from the United States. While the socialist countries have been able to resist political and military pressures, including the nuclear might of the United States, they seem to have willingly accepted the economic influence of the multinationals. The Cold War has been replaced by détente in the political field, and cooperation between the two Super Powers is more pronounced in the economic field. The extensive trade agreements signed between the United States and the From the Archives","PeriodicalId":45012,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Analysis","volume":"47 1","pages":"104 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2023.2188530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I T wo phenomenal developments characterized the change in the international system in the years after the Second World War: (i) the spread of Multinational Corporations (MNCs) and (ii) the rise of a Third World, with its pluralization of political systems, economic forms and social doctrines. While the former is an important factor in the North–South relationship, the latter development has brought about new changes in the international economic system. While not exercising any direct political power, the MNCs are economic giants, mostly belonging to the United States. The emergence of more than 500 MNCs has drastically changed the character of the international system, and while academics continue to discuss whether they are benevolent giants engaged in the task of abolishing poverty and creating a world community, or parasites preying upon the life-blood of the host country, they are spreading their economic tentacles. The MNCs have become the dominant actors in the international system, and several of them today exercise more collective influence than most of the nation states. However, it would be incorrect to regard American MNCs as a tool of American imperialism. They are quite capable of undertaking policies independently of the US Government. Nor are the MNCs completely independent actors, capable of pursuing objectives incompatible with the US national interest. The US Government and the American MNCs function independently of each other, though occasionally the former adopts policies and positions in the field of international relations, which suit the interests of MNCs. In spite of a plurality of States replacing bipolarity in the political field, economic power continues to emanate from the United States. While the socialist countries have been able to resist political and military pressures, including the nuclear might of the United States, they seem to have willingly accepted the economic influence of the multinationals. The Cold War has been replaced by détente in the political field, and cooperation between the two Super Powers is more pronounced in the economic field. The extensive trade agreements signed between the United States and the From the Archives
国际体系:经济和科学技术视角
在第二次世界大战后的几年中,国际制度的变化有两个显著的发展特点:(1)跨国公司的扩散和(2)政治制度、经济形式和社会学说多元化的第三世界的兴起。前者是南北关系中的一个重要因素,后者的发展给国际经济体系带来了新的变化。虽然这些跨国公司不行使任何直接的政治权力,但它们是经济巨头,大多属于美国。500多家跨国公司的出现极大地改变了国际体系的特征,当学者们继续讨论它们是致力于消除贫困和创建一个国际社会的仁慈巨人,还是捕食东道国生命线的寄生虫时,它们正在扩大它们的经济触角。跨国公司已经成为国际体系中的主导角色,其中一些公司今天的集体影响力超过了大多数民族国家。然而,将美国跨国公司视为美帝国主义的工具是不正确的。他们完全有能力独立于美国政府执行政策。跨国公司也不是完全独立的行为体,能够追求与美国国家利益不相容的目标。美国政府和美国跨国公司相互独立运作,尽管美国政府在国际关系领域的政策和立场有时会符合跨国公司的利益。尽管多个国家在政治领域取代了两极化,但经济力量继续来自美国。虽然社会主义国家能够抵抗政治和军事压力,包括美国的核力量,但它们似乎愿意接受跨国公司的经济影响。冷战在政治领域已被争端所取代,两个超级大国之间的合作在经济领域更为明显。美国和中国签署了广泛的贸易协定
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Strategic Analysis
Strategic Analysis INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信