{"title":"Loren Eiseley's Substitution","authors":"B. Kahr","doi":"10.36253/substantia-1040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The anthropologist and acclaimed essayist, Loren Eiseley, in the midst of recounting a vision in the conclusion of a draft of a 1960 composition, “Creativity and Modern Science,” invoked Charles Darwin as the essay’s animating spirit. Eiseley modified his draft the next year and published it in no less than three of his subsequent books. The most striking differences between his draft and published texts is the substitution of Darwin in the final moments of the narrative with Francis Bacon, a barrister and philosopher who died nearly two centuries before the famous biologist was born. Here, is crafted a rationale for this unlikely switch, to the extent that the intent of another can be uncovered, by closely reading Eiseley’s psychologically charged work. Eiseley’s own struggles as both a scientist and an artist, identities respectively epitomized by Darwin and Bacon, reveal how and why the writer permitted his foremost heroes to be substituted, one for the other.","PeriodicalId":32750,"journal":{"name":"Substantia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substantia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/substantia-1040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The anthropologist and acclaimed essayist, Loren Eiseley, in the midst of recounting a vision in the conclusion of a draft of a 1960 composition, “Creativity and Modern Science,” invoked Charles Darwin as the essay’s animating spirit. Eiseley modified his draft the next year and published it in no less than three of his subsequent books. The most striking differences between his draft and published texts is the substitution of Darwin in the final moments of the narrative with Francis Bacon, a barrister and philosopher who died nearly two centuries before the famous biologist was born. Here, is crafted a rationale for this unlikely switch, to the extent that the intent of another can be uncovered, by closely reading Eiseley’s psychologically charged work. Eiseley’s own struggles as both a scientist and an artist, identities respectively epitomized by Darwin and Bacon, reveal how and why the writer permitted his foremost heroes to be substituted, one for the other.
人类学家、著名散文家洛伦·艾斯利(Loren Eiseley)在1960年的一篇文章《创造力与现代科学》(Creativity and Modern Science)的结论中讲述了一个愿景,他援引查尔斯·达尔文(Charles Darwin)作为这篇文章的生动精神。艾斯利在第二年修改了他的草稿,并在随后的三本书中发表。他的草稿和已发表的文本之间最显著的区别是,在叙事的最后时刻,达尔文被弗朗西斯·培根取代。培根是一位律师和哲学家,在这位著名生物学家出生前近两个世纪去世。在这里,通过仔细阅读艾斯利充满心理色彩的作品,我们为这种不太可能的转变精心设计了一个理由,在一定程度上可以揭示另一个人的意图。艾斯利作为一名科学家和艺术家的斗争,分别体现在达尔文和培根身上,揭示了这位作家是如何以及为什么允许他最重要的英雄被取代的。