Smartphone use and perception towards the usefulness and practicality of its applications amongst Ghanaian anaesthetists

Sanjeev Singh, Pavagada Shaifulla, Arti Singh, Isaac Owusu-Ansah
{"title":"Smartphone use and perception towards the usefulness and practicality of its applications amongst Ghanaian anaesthetists","authors":"Sanjeev Singh, Pavagada Shaifulla, Arti Singh, Isaac Owusu-Ansah","doi":"10.4103/hmj.hmj_36_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In recent years, smartphone applications (apps) have generated an increasing interest worldwide. Anaesthesia, as a profession, has been one of the first to adopt new technologies. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to assess the pattern of smartphone use in anaesthesia practice (duration, frequency and purpose of use), determine the perception of its use and identify factors influencing smartphone usage in anaesthesia practice and installation of anaesthesia-related apps amongst anaesthetists in Ghana. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 284 randomly selected Ghanaian anaesthetists was conducted from January 2018 to August 2018, using a previously validated perception domain to measure the perception towards the usefulness and practicality of smartphones. To find the predictors of smartphone use and the installation of medical-related apps in anaesthetic practice, logistic regression models were used. Results: Two hundred and seventy-two anaesthetists responded with a response rate of 95.8%, and 75.9% installed anaesthesia-related apps, whereas 46.1% utilised them. The perception of anaesthetists towards the usefulness and practicality of smartphones in anaesthesia practice was 57.3 ± 18.6 and 61.2 ± 16.8, respectively; the overall percentage mean score was 59.3 ± 17.6, which was less than satisfactory. Only 17.4% of anaesthetists reported a positive level of perception towards smartphone use and practicality. Smartphone usage was 25.4% amongst anaesthetists with negative perceptions towards its usage. The mean total perception mean score was a significant predictor of both smartphone usage (β = 0.031, P < 0.001) and the installation of anaesthesia apps (β = 0.032, P < 0.001) after controlling for possible confounders. Conclusion: Smartphone utilisation in anaesthesia practice is low amongst Ghanaian anaesthetists. This could be ascribed to their less than satisfactory level of perception towards smartphone use in anaesthesia practice. On the other hand, their use and installation of apps in anaesthesia practice were predicted by the perceived usefulness and practicality of their use.","PeriodicalId":34280,"journal":{"name":"Hamdan Medical Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"180 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hamdan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/hmj.hmj_36_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent years, smartphone applications (apps) have generated an increasing interest worldwide. Anaesthesia, as a profession, has been one of the first to adopt new technologies. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to assess the pattern of smartphone use in anaesthesia practice (duration, frequency and purpose of use), determine the perception of its use and identify factors influencing smartphone usage in anaesthesia practice and installation of anaesthesia-related apps amongst anaesthetists in Ghana. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 284 randomly selected Ghanaian anaesthetists was conducted from January 2018 to August 2018, using a previously validated perception domain to measure the perception towards the usefulness and practicality of smartphones. To find the predictors of smartphone use and the installation of medical-related apps in anaesthetic practice, logistic regression models were used. Results: Two hundred and seventy-two anaesthetists responded with a response rate of 95.8%, and 75.9% installed anaesthesia-related apps, whereas 46.1% utilised them. The perception of anaesthetists towards the usefulness and practicality of smartphones in anaesthesia practice was 57.3 ± 18.6 and 61.2 ± 16.8, respectively; the overall percentage mean score was 59.3 ± 17.6, which was less than satisfactory. Only 17.4% of anaesthetists reported a positive level of perception towards smartphone use and practicality. Smartphone usage was 25.4% amongst anaesthetists with negative perceptions towards its usage. The mean total perception mean score was a significant predictor of both smartphone usage (β = 0.031, P < 0.001) and the installation of anaesthesia apps (β = 0.032, P < 0.001) after controlling for possible confounders. Conclusion: Smartphone utilisation in anaesthesia practice is low amongst Ghanaian anaesthetists. This could be ascribed to their less than satisfactory level of perception towards smartphone use in anaesthesia practice. On the other hand, their use and installation of apps in anaesthesia practice were predicted by the perceived usefulness and practicality of their use.
加纳麻醉师对智能手机应用的有用性和实用性的使用和看法
背景:近年来,智能手机应用程序在全球范围内引起了越来越多的兴趣。麻醉师作为一种职业,是最早采用新技术的人之一。目的和目的:本研究旨在评估智能手机在麻醉实践中的使用模式(使用时间、频率和目的),确定对其使用的感知,并确定影响加纳麻醉师在麻醉实践和麻醉相关应用程序安装中使用智能手机的因素。材料和方法:2018年1月至2018年8月,对284名随机选择的加纳麻醉师进行了横断面调查,使用先前验证的感知领域来衡量对智能手机有用性和实用性的感知。为了找到智能手机使用和麻醉实践中医疗相关应用程序安装的预测因素,使用了逻辑回归模型。结果:272名麻醉师的反应率为95.8%,75.9%的麻醉师安装了麻醉相关应用程序,46.1%的麻醉医师使用了这些应用程序。麻醉师对智能手机在麻醉实践中的有用性和实用性的感知分别为57.3±18.6和61.2±16.8;总百分比平均分为59.3±17.6,不太令人满意。只有17.4%的麻醉师表示对智能手机的使用和实用性有积极的看法。在对智能手机使用持负面看法的麻醉师中,智能手机的使用率为25.4%。在控制了可能的混杂因素后,平均总感知平均得分是智能手机使用量(β=0.031,P<0.001)和麻醉应用程序安装量(β=0.032,<0.001)的重要预测指标。结论:加纳麻醉师在麻醉实践中使用智能手机的比例较低。这可能归因于他们对麻醉实践中使用智能手机的认知水平不太令人满意。另一方面,他们在麻醉实践中使用和安装应用程序是根据其使用的有用性和实用性来预测的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信