Making More Room for Mercy and Forgiveness

Q2 Social Sciences
Steven Tudor
{"title":"Making More Room for Mercy and Forgiveness","authors":"Steven Tudor","doi":"10.1080/0731129X.2021.1943845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Malcolm Bull. On Mercy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019, 191 pp., $24.95 (hardback), ISBN 9780691165332 Martha Minow. When Should Law Forgive? New York: Norton, 2019, 252 pp., $27.95 (hardback), ISBN 9780393081763 Most political theorists would agree that the abuse of power is a bad thing, and that a political system should try to prevent it from occurring or, when it can’t, at least limit it and then somehow remedy or ameliorate it. Whether the power is legislative, judicial, or executive— or, indeed, of other kinds beyond that familiar trinity—it is important that the system that generates (and possibly legitimates) that power has ways of constraining or directing it, so that its wielders don’t use it to oppress those who are subject to it, or to inflict cruelties or humiliations upon them, or to enrich themselves at the expense of the powerless. In that task of thwarting the abuse of power, some conception of justice has usually had some central role to play. Justice might help to define— and thereby limit—the power itself (e.g. judicial power might be defined in terms of the power to do justice according to law, in particular cases brought to the court by a plaintiff or prosecutor), and it might help to constrain its application (e.g. through rules of procedural fairness). At the core of most conceptions of justice are ideas of equality, consistency, impartiality, desert, and rights, among others. These in turn often get cashed out practically in terms of rules (legal or extra-legal) that, among other things, set standards for the wielders of power so that an abuse of power is understood as a breach of those standards and can thus be more readily identified and its correction or amelioration more readily conceived. (Whether there is practical capacity and the will to put such correction or amelioration into effect is another matter). There is little doubt that, in modern Western polities at least, justice must play some sort of central role here, but the two books under discussion here, Malcolm Bull’s On Mercy and Martha Minow’s When Should Law Forgive? S.tudor@latrobe.edu.au Criminal Justice Ethics, 2021 Vol. 40, No. 2, 152–163, https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2021.1943845","PeriodicalId":35931,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0731129X.2021.1943845","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2021.1943845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Malcolm Bull. On Mercy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019, 191 pp., $24.95 (hardback), ISBN 9780691165332 Martha Minow. When Should Law Forgive? New York: Norton, 2019, 252 pp., $27.95 (hardback), ISBN 9780393081763 Most political theorists would agree that the abuse of power is a bad thing, and that a political system should try to prevent it from occurring or, when it can’t, at least limit it and then somehow remedy or ameliorate it. Whether the power is legislative, judicial, or executive— or, indeed, of other kinds beyond that familiar trinity—it is important that the system that generates (and possibly legitimates) that power has ways of constraining or directing it, so that its wielders don’t use it to oppress those who are subject to it, or to inflict cruelties or humiliations upon them, or to enrich themselves at the expense of the powerless. In that task of thwarting the abuse of power, some conception of justice has usually had some central role to play. Justice might help to define— and thereby limit—the power itself (e.g. judicial power might be defined in terms of the power to do justice according to law, in particular cases brought to the court by a plaintiff or prosecutor), and it might help to constrain its application (e.g. through rules of procedural fairness). At the core of most conceptions of justice are ideas of equality, consistency, impartiality, desert, and rights, among others. These in turn often get cashed out practically in terms of rules (legal or extra-legal) that, among other things, set standards for the wielders of power so that an abuse of power is understood as a breach of those standards and can thus be more readily identified and its correction or amelioration more readily conceived. (Whether there is practical capacity and the will to put such correction or amelioration into effect is another matter). There is little doubt that, in modern Western polities at least, justice must play some sort of central role here, but the two books under discussion here, Malcolm Bull’s On Mercy and Martha Minow’s When Should Law Forgive? S.tudor@latrobe.edu.au Criminal Justice Ethics, 2021 Vol. 40, No. 2, 152–163, https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2021.1943845
为仁慈和宽恕腾出更多空间
马尔科姆公牛。在怜悯。普林斯顿:普林斯顿大学出版社,2019年,191页,24.95美元(精装本),ISBN 9780691165332玛莎·米诺。法律何时应该宽恕?纽约:诺顿出版社,2019年,252页,27.95美元(精装本),ISBN 9780393081763大多数政治理论家都会同意,滥用权力是一件坏事,政治制度应该试图阻止它的发生,或者,当它不能时,至少限制它,然后以某种方式补救或改善它。无论权力是立法权、司法权还是行政权——或者,实际上,是超越这三位一体的其他类型的权力——重要的是,产生(并可能使之合法化)权力的制度要有约束或指导权力的方法,这样权力的拥有者就不会用它来压迫那些受它支配的人,或者对他们施加残酷或羞辱,或者以牺牲无权者的利益为代价来充实自己。在阻止权力滥用的任务中,某些正义概念通常起着核心作用。正义可能有助于界定-并因此限制-权力本身(例如,司法权可能被定义为根据法律伸张正义的权力,在由原告或检察官向法院提起的特定案件中),它可能有助于限制其适用(例如,通过程序公平规则)。大多数正义观念的核心是平等、一致、公正、应得和权利等观念。反过来,这些通常以规则(法律或法外规则)的形式实际兑现,这些规则除其他外,为权力的行使者设定了标准,因此滥用权力被理解为违反这些标准,因此可以更容易地识别并更容易地设想其纠正或改进。(是否有实际的能力和意愿来实施这种纠正或改善是另一回事)。毫无疑问,至少在现代西方政治中,正义必须在这里发挥某种核心作用,但这里讨论的两本书,马尔科姆·布尔的《论仁慈》和玛莎·米诺的《法律何时应该宽恕?》S.tudor@latrobe.edu.au刑事司法伦理,2021年第40卷第2期,152-163,https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2021.1943845
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Criminal Justice Ethics
Criminal Justice Ethics Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信