{"title":"‘Going for the Jugular’: The Steelworkers’ Banner and the 1980 National Steelworkers’ Strike in Britain","authors":"Charlie McGuire","doi":"10.3828/HSIR.2017.38.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Across a thirteen-week period from January to April 1980, a national steelworkers’ strike took place in Britain. Ostensibly a pay dispute between the steel unions and the nationalized British Steel Corporation (BSC), the strike brought into focus some of the deeper problems the industry faced. As articulated by successive governments, the media, BSC, and even elements within the leadership of the steel unions themselves, these problems were almost wholly a result of poor productivity and over-staffing in the industry. However, during the strike the main steelworkers’ union, the Iron and Steel Trades Confederation, produced a journal, the Steelworkers’ Banner, which challenged this consensus and provided a rationale for the strike. Basing its arguments on original research, the Banner produced evidence of BSC’s mismanagement and produced an alternative strategy for the industry. This did not prevail but is significant as a rare example of a trade-union challenge to the managerial prerogative in relation to company strategy.","PeriodicalId":36746,"journal":{"name":"Historical Studies in Industrial Relations","volume":"38 1","pages":"97-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3828/HSIR.2017.38.5","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Studies in Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/HSIR.2017.38.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Across a thirteen-week period from January to April 1980, a national steelworkers’ strike took place in Britain. Ostensibly a pay dispute between the steel unions and the nationalized British Steel Corporation (BSC), the strike brought into focus some of the deeper problems the industry faced. As articulated by successive governments, the media, BSC, and even elements within the leadership of the steel unions themselves, these problems were almost wholly a result of poor productivity and over-staffing in the industry. However, during the strike the main steelworkers’ union, the Iron and Steel Trades Confederation, produced a journal, the Steelworkers’ Banner, which challenged this consensus and provided a rationale for the strike. Basing its arguments on original research, the Banner produced evidence of BSC’s mismanagement and produced an alternative strategy for the industry. This did not prevail but is significant as a rare example of a trade-union challenge to the managerial prerogative in relation to company strategy.
从1980年1月到4月的13周时间里,英国发生了一场全国性的钢铁工人罢工。表面上看,这次罢工是钢铁工会和国有化的英国钢铁公司(BSC)之间的薪酬纠纷,但它使钢铁业面临的一些更深层次的问题得到了关注。正如历届政府、媒体、BSC甚至钢铁工会领导层内部人士所阐述的那样,这些问题几乎完全是由于该行业生产率低下和人员过多造成的。然而,在罢工期间,主要的钢铁工人工会钢铁贸易联合会(Iron and Steel Trades Confederation)出版了一份名为《钢铁工人旗帜》(steelworkers’Banner)的杂志,挑战了这一共识,并为罢工提供了理由。基于其原始研究的论点,班纳提出了平衡计分卡管理不善的证据,并为该行业提出了另一种战略。这并没有占上风,但作为工会挑战与公司战略有关的管理特权的罕见例子具有重要意义。