The construction of a quick TPACK evaluation tool and comparison of an integrative and transformational model

Ratnawati Susanto
{"title":"The construction of a quick TPACK evaluation tool and comparison of an integrative and transformational model","authors":"Ratnawati Susanto","doi":"10.23916/0020210635020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well recognized that the model of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) is one of the most prominent frameworks for describing teachers' skills to successfully educate students via the use of technology. Self-report questionnaires are often used in TPACK assessment, limiting the measures' validity, reliability, and practical application. The TPACK framework's underlying structure also causes confusion among participants. An integrated or transformational picture of how the TPACK knowledge domains interact was determined by the framework's inherent linkages. Methods and findings One hundred and seventeen pre-service elementary school teachers were issued a 42-item pilot questionnaire. Reliability analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to reduce the number of items on each subscale and to ensure that the model was well-fitting. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the internal connections that existed between the components. In conclusion, the 28-item final TPAC questionnaire is a feasible and reliable tool for assessing pre-service teachers' knowledge, skills, and attitudes toward learning (TPACK). The intrinsic links between knowledge components in the TPACK paradigm also allow for a transformational interpretation to be applied.","PeriodicalId":31944,"journal":{"name":"COUNSEDU The International Journal of Counseling and Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COUNSEDU The International Journal of Counseling and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23916/0020210635020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

It is well recognized that the model of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) is one of the most prominent frameworks for describing teachers' skills to successfully educate students via the use of technology. Self-report questionnaires are often used in TPACK assessment, limiting the measures' validity, reliability, and practical application. The TPACK framework's underlying structure also causes confusion among participants. An integrated or transformational picture of how the TPACK knowledge domains interact was determined by the framework's inherent linkages. Methods and findings One hundred and seventeen pre-service elementary school teachers were issued a 42-item pilot questionnaire. Reliability analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to reduce the number of items on each subscale and to ensure that the model was well-fitting. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the internal connections that existed between the components. In conclusion, the 28-item final TPAC questionnaire is a feasible and reliable tool for assessing pre-service teachers' knowledge, skills, and attitudes toward learning (TPACK). The intrinsic links between knowledge components in the TPACK paradigm also allow for a transformational interpretation to be applied.
快速TPACK评估工具的构建及综合与转换模型的比较
众所周知,技术教学内容知识(TPACK)模型是描述教师通过使用技术成功教育学生的技能的最突出的框架之一。在TPACK评估中,往往采用自述式问卷,限制了量表的效度、信度和实际应用。TPACK框架的底层结构也会引起参与者之间的混淆。TPACK知识领域如何相互作用的集成或转换图像由框架的内在联系决定。方法与发现对117名小学职前教师进行问卷调查。采用信度分析和验证性因子分析来减少每个子量表的条目数量,以确保模型的拟合良好。采用结构方程模型分析构件之间存在的内在联系。综上所述,28项的最终TPAC问卷是评估职前教师知识、技能和学习态度(TPACK)的可行和可靠的工具。TPACK范式中知识组件之间的内在联系也允许应用转换解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书