An Evaluation of Hemoglobin A1c Monitoring at a Student-Run Free Clinic in Kansas City, Missouri

Madhavi Murali, Alaya Bodepudi, Imaima Casubhoy, E. Kraemer
{"title":"An Evaluation of Hemoglobin A1c Monitoring at a Student-Run Free Clinic in Kansas City, Missouri","authors":"Madhavi Murali, Alaya Bodepudi, Imaima Casubhoy, E. Kraemer","doi":"10.59586/jsrc.v7i1.232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The hemoglobin A1c is critical for monitoring and managing type II diabetes and providing clinicians with a framework for a treatment plan. Our study analyzes compliance to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) standards of appropriate A1c monitoring and encourages other clinics to monitor the same information within their own clinics. \nMethods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients who visited the Sojourner Health Clinic between January 2017 and November 2019. All patients who had met the criteria for A1c screening based on recommendations from the ADA were included in the study, as well as patients who were charted as diabetic or pre-diabetic. A total of 88 patients met the criteria for this study. Data collected included patient documentation as diabetic or pre-diabetic and patients’ three most recent A1c values with corresponding dates. Based on this data, these patients were categorized as diabetic, pre-diabetic, or non-diabetic, and were evaluated on whether their A1c was monitored at appropriate intervals. \nResults: A total of 21.6% of patients were monitored appropriately for their diabetic status determined by their A1c values. Only 18.2% of diabetic patients were accurately monitored. Patients with an unknown diabetic status had the lowest rate of appropriate monitoring. \nConclusions: Most patients at the Sojourner Health Clinic are not properly monitored for diabetes using the clinic's modified A1c monitoring guidelines. The clinic can make several improvements to strengthen adherence to these guidelines with the implementation of new protocols for better A1c monitoring. Further studies should be made to assess the efficacy of these changes.","PeriodicalId":73958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of student-run clinics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of student-run clinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59586/jsrc.v7i1.232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The hemoglobin A1c is critical for monitoring and managing type II diabetes and providing clinicians with a framework for a treatment plan. Our study analyzes compliance to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) standards of appropriate A1c monitoring and encourages other clinics to monitor the same information within their own clinics. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients who visited the Sojourner Health Clinic between January 2017 and November 2019. All patients who had met the criteria for A1c screening based on recommendations from the ADA were included in the study, as well as patients who were charted as diabetic or pre-diabetic. A total of 88 patients met the criteria for this study. Data collected included patient documentation as diabetic or pre-diabetic and patients’ three most recent A1c values with corresponding dates. Based on this data, these patients were categorized as diabetic, pre-diabetic, or non-diabetic, and were evaluated on whether their A1c was monitored at appropriate intervals. Results: A total of 21.6% of patients were monitored appropriately for their diabetic status determined by their A1c values. Only 18.2% of diabetic patients were accurately monitored. Patients with an unknown diabetic status had the lowest rate of appropriate monitoring. Conclusions: Most patients at the Sojourner Health Clinic are not properly monitored for diabetes using the clinic's modified A1c monitoring guidelines. The clinic can make several improvements to strengthen adherence to these guidelines with the implementation of new protocols for better A1c monitoring. Further studies should be made to assess the efficacy of these changes.
密苏里州堪萨斯城学生免费诊所对糖化血红蛋白监测的评估
背景:糖化血红蛋白对监测和管理II型糖尿病至关重要,并为临床医生提供治疗计划的框架。我们的研究分析了遵守美国糖尿病协会(ADA)适当的A1c监测标准的情况,并鼓励其他诊所在自己的诊所内监测相同的信息。方法:对2017年1月至2019年11月在索杰纳健康诊所就诊的所有患者进行回顾性图表分析。根据ADA的建议,所有符合A1c筛查标准的患者以及糖尿病或糖尿病前期患者都被纳入研究。共有88例患者符合本研究的标准。收集的数据包括患者记录为糖尿病或糖尿病前期和患者最近的A1c值与相应的日期。根据这些数据,将这些患者分为糖尿病、糖尿病前期或非糖尿病,并评估他们的A1c是否在适当的时间间隔进行监测。结果:共有21.6%的患者通过A1c值对糖尿病状态进行了适当的监测。只有18.2%的糖尿病患者得到了准确的监测。糖尿病状态不明的患者接受适当监测的比例最低。结论:Sojourner健康诊所的大多数患者没有使用该诊所修改的A1c监测指南进行适当的糖尿病监测。诊所可以通过实施更好的A1c监测新方案来加强对这些指南的遵守。应该进行进一步的研究来评估这些改变的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信