A necessary reform of agriculture market access rules

IF 1 Q2 LAW

Journal of International Trade Law and Policy Pub Date : 2020-06-30 DOI:10.1108/jitlp-06-2019-0030

Ismaelline Eba Nguema

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate by text and empirical facts, the need to reform the rules in force.,This study confronts current standards with empirical facts. To do this, it is postulated that even though current market access standards are better that the Gatt 1947 rules, they leave the possibility for some members to hijack them to eventually increase their protection effective tariff.,Market access standards for agricultural products should be reformed because of their asymmetry. To put an end to this asymmetry, these standards should be rebalanced. This is precisely the challenge of the current multilateral negotiations.,Unlike the studies conducted on this subject (to my knowledge), which are mainly based on economic or political science methods, this analysis is essentially based on legal reasoning law.

查看原文本刊更多论文

农业市场准入规则的必要改革

本文的目的是通过文本和实证事实来证明改革现行规则的必要性。，这项研究用经验事实来对抗当前的标准。为了做到这一点，有人假设，尽管目前的市场准入标准比Gatt 1947规则更好，但它们给一些成员国留下了劫持它们的可能性，以最终提高其保护有效关税。，由于农产品市场准入标准的不对称性，应该对其进行改革。为了结束这种不对称，这些标准应该重新平衡。这正是当前多边谈判面临的挑战。，据我所知，与主要基于经济或政治科学方法对这一主题进行的研究不同，这种分析本质上是基于法律推理法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of International Trade Law and Policy LAW-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of International Trade Law and Policy is a peer reviewed interdisciplinary journal with a focus upon the nexus of international economic policy and international economic law. It is receptive, but not limited, to the methods of economics, law, and the social sciences. As scholars tend to read individual articles of particular interest to them, rather than an entire issue, authors are not required to write with full accessibility to readers from all disciplines within the purview of the Journal. However, interdisciplinary communication should be fostered where possible. Thus economists can utilize quantitative methods (including econometrics and statistics), while legal scholars and political scientists can invoke specialized techniques and theories. Appendices are encouraged for more technical material. Submissions should contribute to understanding international economic policy and the institutional/legal architecture in which it is implemented. Submissions can be conceptual (theoretical) and/or empirical and/or doctrinal in content. Topics of interest to the Journal are expected to evolve over time but include: -All aspects of international trade law and policy -All aspects of international investment law and policy -All aspects of international development law and policy -All aspects of international financial law and policy -Relationship between economic policy and law and other societal concerns, including the human rights, environment, health, development, and national security