Historical and Empirical Evidence for the Schism in the Millennial Generation (Conclusion)

V. Radaev
{"title":"Historical and Empirical Evidence for the Schism in the Millennial Generation (Conclusion)","authors":"V. Radaev","doi":"10.1080/10610154.2022.2111190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this concluding article, the author continues to present the results of his empirical analysis based on the division of the Millennial generation into two age groups. The author devotes particular attention to a special group of “3S” Millennials (standing for “smartphones,” “social networks,” and “slowing economy”) who have come of age during the period since 2008, which has been characterized by the long decline of the Russian economy and the massive spread of new technologies and digital user services. Data from the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey of the Health and Economic Welfare of the Population conducted by the National Research University Higher School of Economics (1994–2018) is used. The study shows that while Millennials are different in many ways from other generations, members of the generation also differ from each across multiple social characteristics. The second part of the article shows that younger 3S Millennials drink alcohol less often and in smaller quantities, smoke less, exercise more often, watch less TV, read more, participate more in cultural life and creative activities, are less religious, and are more optimistic regarding their financial situation and life in general. Many intergenerational and intragenerational differences remain significant even after introducing standard control variables and when neighboring generations are adjusted to a similar median age. In conclusion, four typical situations are identified that characterize the ratio of intergenerational to intragenerational differences.","PeriodicalId":85546,"journal":{"name":"Sociological research","volume":"59 1","pages":"32 - 61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10610154.2022.2111190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this concluding article, the author continues to present the results of his empirical analysis based on the division of the Millennial generation into two age groups. The author devotes particular attention to a special group of “3S” Millennials (standing for “smartphones,” “social networks,” and “slowing economy”) who have come of age during the period since 2008, which has been characterized by the long decline of the Russian economy and the massive spread of new technologies and digital user services. Data from the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey of the Health and Economic Welfare of the Population conducted by the National Research University Higher School of Economics (1994–2018) is used. The study shows that while Millennials are different in many ways from other generations, members of the generation also differ from each across multiple social characteristics. The second part of the article shows that younger 3S Millennials drink alcohol less often and in smaller quantities, smoke less, exercise more often, watch less TV, read more, participate more in cultural life and creative activities, are less religious, and are more optimistic regarding their financial situation and life in general. Many intergenerational and intragenerational differences remain significant even after introducing standard control variables and when neighboring generations are adjusted to a similar median age. In conclusion, four typical situations are identified that characterize the ratio of intergenerational to intragenerational differences.
千禧一代分裂的历史与经验证据(结语)
摘要在这篇总结文章中,作者继续介绍了基于千禧一代分为两个年龄组的实证分析结果。作者特别关注了一批特殊的“3S”千禧一代(代表“智能手机”、“社交网络”和“经济放缓”),他们在2008年以来的这段时间里已经成年,其特点是俄罗斯经济的长期衰退以及新技术和数字用户服务的大规模传播。使用的数据来自国立研究型大学高等经济学院进行的俄罗斯人口健康和经济福利纵向监测调查(1994-2018)。研究表明,虽然千禧一代在很多方面与其他几代人不同,但这一代人在多种社会特征上也有所不同。文章的第二部分显示,年轻的3S千禧一代饮酒次数较少,饮酒量较小,吸烟较少,经常锻炼,少看电视,多读书,更多地参与文化生活和创造性活动,较少信教,对自己的经济状况和生活总体上更乐观。即使在引入标准控制变量后,当相邻几代人被调整到相似的中位年龄时,许多代际和代际差异仍然显著。总之,确定了四种典型情况,这些情况表征了代际差异与代际差异的比率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信