{"title":"Standards-based assessment for secondary choral ensembles: a framework to document student learning","authors":"M. Myers","doi":"10.1080/10632913.2021.1877229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Though one of the first disciplines to incorporate national standards in its curricula, the field of music education has not traditionally shown much consistency in its assessments, with disparities in priorities on both local and national levels. Schools often allow teachers the freedom to cover whichever content standards they choose, whether those benchmarks come from the district, state, or national level. Though secondary choral teachers may express freedom and creativity through the repertoire they program for their choirs, they can ensure that all students gain similar skills and training by incorporating a variety of standards-based assessment strategies in their performance ensembles. As choral music educators seek to improve the level of musical artistry and growth in their classrooms, they should incorporate structured individualized assessments which address all eleven of the National Core Arts Standards in order to guide teaching and learning of a wide variety of musical and academic skills and improve documentation of learning for communication with students, families, and administration.","PeriodicalId":37632,"journal":{"name":"Arts Education Policy Review","volume":"124 1","pages":"1 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10632913.2021.1877229","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts Education Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.1877229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract Though one of the first disciplines to incorporate national standards in its curricula, the field of music education has not traditionally shown much consistency in its assessments, with disparities in priorities on both local and national levels. Schools often allow teachers the freedom to cover whichever content standards they choose, whether those benchmarks come from the district, state, or national level. Though secondary choral teachers may express freedom and creativity through the repertoire they program for their choirs, they can ensure that all students gain similar skills and training by incorporating a variety of standards-based assessment strategies in their performance ensembles. As choral music educators seek to improve the level of musical artistry and growth in their classrooms, they should incorporate structured individualized assessments which address all eleven of the National Core Arts Standards in order to guide teaching and learning of a wide variety of musical and academic skills and improve documentation of learning for communication with students, families, and administration.
期刊介绍:
Arts Education Policy Review ( AEPR) presents discussion of major policy issues in arts education in the United States and throughout the world. Addressing education in music, visual arts, theatre, and dance, the journal presents a variety of views and emphasizes critical analysis. Its goal is to produce the most comprehensive and rigorous exchange of ideas available on arts education policy. Policy examinations from multiple viewpoints are a valuable resource not only for arts educators, but also for administrators, policy analysts, advocacy groups, parents, and audiences—all those involved in the arts and concerned about their role in education. AEPR focuses on analyses and recommendations focused on policy. The goal of any article should not be description or celebration (although reports of successful programs could be part of an article). Any article focused on a program (or programs) should address why something works or does not work, how it works, how it could work better, and most important, what various policy stakeholders (from teachers to legislators) can do about it. AEPR does not promote individuals, institutions, methods, or products. It does not aim to repeat commonplace ideas. Editors want articles that show originality, probe deeply, and take discussion beyond common wisdom and familiar rhetoric. Articles that merely restate the importance of arts education, call attention to the existence of issues long since addressed, or repeat standard solutions will not be accepted.