Standards-based assessment for secondary choral ensembles: a framework to document student learning

Q1 Arts and Humanities
M. Myers
{"title":"Standards-based assessment for secondary choral ensembles: a framework to document student learning","authors":"M. Myers","doi":"10.1080/10632913.2021.1877229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Though one of the first disciplines to incorporate national standards in its curricula, the field of music education has not traditionally shown much consistency in its assessments, with disparities in priorities on both local and national levels. Schools often allow teachers the freedom to cover whichever content standards they choose, whether those benchmarks come from the district, state, or national level. Though secondary choral teachers may express freedom and creativity through the repertoire they program for their choirs, they can ensure that all students gain similar skills and training by incorporating a variety of standards-based assessment strategies in their performance ensembles. As choral music educators seek to improve the level of musical artistry and growth in their classrooms, they should incorporate structured individualized assessments which address all eleven of the National Core Arts Standards in order to guide teaching and learning of a wide variety of musical and academic skills and improve documentation of learning for communication with students, families, and administration.","PeriodicalId":37632,"journal":{"name":"Arts Education Policy Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10632913.2021.1877229","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts Education Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.1877229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Though one of the first disciplines to incorporate national standards in its curricula, the field of music education has not traditionally shown much consistency in its assessments, with disparities in priorities on both local and national levels. Schools often allow teachers the freedom to cover whichever content standards they choose, whether those benchmarks come from the district, state, or national level. Though secondary choral teachers may express freedom and creativity through the repertoire they program for their choirs, they can ensure that all students gain similar skills and training by incorporating a variety of standards-based assessment strategies in their performance ensembles. As choral music educators seek to improve the level of musical artistry and growth in their classrooms, they should incorporate structured individualized assessments which address all eleven of the National Core Arts Standards in order to guide teaching and learning of a wide variety of musical and academic skills and improve documentation of learning for communication with students, families, and administration.
中学合唱的标准评估:记录学生学习的框架
摘要尽管音乐教育是最早将国家标准纳入课程的学科之一,但传统上,音乐教育领域的评估并不一致,地方和国家层面的优先事项存在差异。学校通常允许教师自由涵盖他们选择的任何内容标准,无论这些基准来自地区、州还是国家层面。尽管中学合唱教师可以通过他们为合唱团编排的曲目来表达自由和创造力,但他们可以通过在表演合奏中纳入各种基于标准的评估策略,确保所有学生都能获得类似的技能和培训。当合唱音乐教育工作者寻求提高课堂上的音乐艺术水平和成长水平时,他们应该纳入符合所有11项国家核心艺术标准的结构化个性化评估,以指导各种音乐和学术技能的教学,并改进与学生、家庭、,以及行政管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arts Education Policy Review
Arts Education Policy Review Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Arts Education Policy Review ( AEPR) presents discussion of major policy issues in arts education in the United States and throughout the world. Addressing education in music, visual arts, theatre, and dance, the journal presents a variety of views and emphasizes critical analysis. Its goal is to produce the most comprehensive and rigorous exchange of ideas available on arts education policy. Policy examinations from multiple viewpoints are a valuable resource not only for arts educators, but also for administrators, policy analysts, advocacy groups, parents, and audiences—all those involved in the arts and concerned about their role in education. AEPR focuses on analyses and recommendations focused on policy. The goal of any article should not be description or celebration (although reports of successful programs could be part of an article). Any article focused on a program (or programs) should address why something works or does not work, how it works, how it could work better, and most important, what various policy stakeholders (from teachers to legislators) can do about it. AEPR does not promote individuals, institutions, methods, or products. It does not aim to repeat commonplace ideas. Editors want articles that show originality, probe deeply, and take discussion beyond common wisdom and familiar rhetoric. Articles that merely restate the importance of arts education, call attention to the existence of issues long since addressed, or repeat standard solutions will not be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信