Inclusive school environment: evaluation by education actors

E. A. Kukuev, Ludmila M. Volosnikova, Ludmila V. Fedina
{"title":"Inclusive school environment: evaluation by education actors","authors":"E. A. Kukuev, Ludmila M. Volosnikova, Ludmila V. Fedina","doi":"10.32744/pse.2023.4.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The formation of inclusive education requires an evidence-based policy. The study of the attitude of individual participants of the educational process to inclusion does not provide a comprehensive result. The purpose of the study is a comparative analysis of the assessments of the inclusive school environment by the subjects of education (teachers, students, parents). Research methods. The main research method was a survey based on author's questionnaires adapted for each sample during the pilot study of 2021. The sample of the study in 2022 was made up of teachers (1077), parents (1583) and students (3282) from schools in the south of the Tyumen region (Russian Federation). Factor analysis was carried out using the statistical software package SPSS 23.0. Results. On average, a positive assessment of the inclusive environment at school was demonstrated (3.9 points out of 5). It is shown that meaningfully all models combine statements on three factors: \"Principles and values\", \"Communication\", \"Organization\". The factor model of assessments of the inclusive environment by teachers (51.13%) determines the following algorithm: the creation of organizational conditions (19.14%), then the organization of interaction (17.7%), and the declared principles and values (14.29%.). In the factor model, students (48.79%) proceed from the practice of implementing inclusion in interaction (21.52%), then the value bases of this interaction (16.11%) and then the conditions of its organization (11.16%). The model of parents (50.42%) determines the order of factors: from principles and values (17.77%) – to communication (16.83%) – and, to organizational conditions (15.82%). Conclusion. For the first time, a comparative analysis of the assessment of the inclusive environment of the subjects of education was carried out. The analysis of the content of the statements of factors indicates specific elements of an inclusive environment that are significant in the assessments of each group. Meaningfully, the models express the principles of inclusive excellence in the context of strengthening social ideas of equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI). The obtained factor models can be used as the basis for strategies for organizing work with each group of subjects of education.","PeriodicalId":37196,"journal":{"name":"Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2023.4.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The formation of inclusive education requires an evidence-based policy. The study of the attitude of individual participants of the educational process to inclusion does not provide a comprehensive result. The purpose of the study is a comparative analysis of the assessments of the inclusive school environment by the subjects of education (teachers, students, parents). Research methods. The main research method was a survey based on author's questionnaires adapted for each sample during the pilot study of 2021. The sample of the study in 2022 was made up of teachers (1077), parents (1583) and students (3282) from schools in the south of the Tyumen region (Russian Federation). Factor analysis was carried out using the statistical software package SPSS 23.0. Results. On average, a positive assessment of the inclusive environment at school was demonstrated (3.9 points out of 5). It is shown that meaningfully all models combine statements on three factors: "Principles and values", "Communication", "Organization". The factor model of assessments of the inclusive environment by teachers (51.13%) determines the following algorithm: the creation of organizational conditions (19.14%), then the organization of interaction (17.7%), and the declared principles and values (14.29%.). In the factor model, students (48.79%) proceed from the practice of implementing inclusion in interaction (21.52%), then the value bases of this interaction (16.11%) and then the conditions of its organization (11.16%). The model of parents (50.42%) determines the order of factors: from principles and values (17.77%) – to communication (16.83%) – and, to organizational conditions (15.82%). Conclusion. For the first time, a comparative analysis of the assessment of the inclusive environment of the subjects of education was carried out. The analysis of the content of the statements of factors indicates specific elements of an inclusive environment that are significant in the assessments of each group. Meaningfully, the models express the principles of inclusive excellence in the context of strengthening social ideas of equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI). The obtained factor models can be used as the basis for strategies for organizing work with each group of subjects of education.
包容性学校环境:教育行动者的评价
介绍包容性教育的形成需要循证政策。对教育过程中个体参与者对包容的态度的研究并没有提供全面的结果。本研究的目的是对教育主体(教师、学生、家长)对包容性学校环境的评估进行比较分析。研究方法。主要研究方法是在2021年的试点研究中,根据作者对每个样本的问卷进行调查。2022年的研究样本由秋明地区(俄罗斯联邦)南部学校的教师(1077人)、家长(1583人)和学生(3282人)组成。采用SPSS 23.0统计软件包进行因子分析。后果平均而言,对学校包容性环境的评价是积极的(3.9分,满分5分)。研究表明,所有模型都有意义地结合了关于三个因素的陈述:“原则和价值观”、“沟通”、“组织”。教师评估包容性环境的因素模型(51.13%)确定了以下算法:组织条件的创造(19.14%),然后是互动的组织(17.7%),以及宣布的原则和价值观(14.29%),然后是这种互动的价值基础(16.11%),然后是其组织条件(11.16%)。父母模型(50.42%)决定了因素的顺序:从原则和价值观(17.77%)到沟通(16.83%),再到组织条件(15.82%)。结论。首次对教育科目的包容性环境评估进行了比较分析。对因素陈述内容的分析表明,包容性环境的具体要素对每个群体的评估都很重要。有意义的是,这些模型在加强平等、多样性和包容性的社会理念的背景下表达了包容性卓越的原则。所获得的因素模型可以作为组织每组教育科目工作的策略的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania
Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
162
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信