Design strategies for oxy-combustion power plant captured CO2 purification

IF 1 Q4 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Ikenna J. Okeke, Tia Ghantous, Thomas A. Adams
{"title":"Design strategies for oxy-combustion power plant captured CO2 purification","authors":"Ikenna J. Okeke, Tia Ghantous, Thomas A. Adams","doi":"10.1515/cppm-2021-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study presents a novel design and techno-economic analysis of processes for the purification of captured CO2 from the flue gas of an oxy-combustion power plant fueled by petroleum coke. Four candidate process designs were analyzed in terms of GHG emissions, thermal efficiency, pipeline CO2 purity, CO2 capture rate, levelized costs of electricity, and cost of CO2 avoided. The candidates were a classic process with flue-gas water removal via condensation, flue-gas water removal via condensation followed by flue-gas oxygen removal through cryogenic distillation, flue-gas water removal followed by catalytic conversion of oxygen in the flue gas to water via reaction with hydrogen, and oxy-combustion in a slightly oxygen-deprived environment with flue-gas water removal and no need for flue gas oxygen removal. The former two were studied in prior works and the latter two concepts are new to this work. The eco-technoeconomic analysis results indicated trade-offs between the four options in terms of cost, efficiency, lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, costs of CO2 avoided, technical readiness, and captured CO2 quality. The slightly oxygen-deprived process has the lowest costs of CO2 avoided, but requires tolerance of a small amount of H2, CO, and light hydrocarbons in the captured CO2 which may or may not be feasible depending on the CO2 end use. If infeasible, the catalytic de-oxygenation process is the next best choice. Overall, this work is the first study to perform eco-technoeconomic analyses of different techniques for O2 removal from CO2 captured from an oxy-combustion power plant.","PeriodicalId":9935,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Product and Process Modeling","volume":"18 1","pages":"135 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Product and Process Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2021-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This study presents a novel design and techno-economic analysis of processes for the purification of captured CO2 from the flue gas of an oxy-combustion power plant fueled by petroleum coke. Four candidate process designs were analyzed in terms of GHG emissions, thermal efficiency, pipeline CO2 purity, CO2 capture rate, levelized costs of electricity, and cost of CO2 avoided. The candidates were a classic process with flue-gas water removal via condensation, flue-gas water removal via condensation followed by flue-gas oxygen removal through cryogenic distillation, flue-gas water removal followed by catalytic conversion of oxygen in the flue gas to water via reaction with hydrogen, and oxy-combustion in a slightly oxygen-deprived environment with flue-gas water removal and no need for flue gas oxygen removal. The former two were studied in prior works and the latter two concepts are new to this work. The eco-technoeconomic analysis results indicated trade-offs between the four options in terms of cost, efficiency, lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, costs of CO2 avoided, technical readiness, and captured CO2 quality. The slightly oxygen-deprived process has the lowest costs of CO2 avoided, but requires tolerance of a small amount of H2, CO, and light hydrocarbons in the captured CO2 which may or may not be feasible depending on the CO2 end use. If infeasible, the catalytic de-oxygenation process is the next best choice. Overall, this work is the first study to perform eco-technoeconomic analyses of different techniques for O2 removal from CO2 captured from an oxy-combustion power plant.
全氧燃烧电厂捕集二氧化碳净化设计策略
摘要:本研究提出了一种新的设计和技术经济分析方法,用于从石油焦为燃料的全氧燃烧电厂烟气中净化捕获的二氧化碳。从温室气体排放、热效率、管道二氧化碳纯度、二氧化碳捕集率、平准化电力成本和二氧化碳避免成本等方面分析了四种候选工艺设计。候选工艺包括:通过冷凝去除烟气水、通过冷凝去除烟气水、然后通过低温蒸馏去除烟气氧、通过与氢反应将烟气中的氧催化转化为水、以及在轻度缺氧环境下的氧燃烧,通过去除烟气水而不需要去除烟气氧。前两个概念是前人研究过的,后两个概念是本文的新概念。生态技术经济分析结果表明,在成本、效率、生命周期温室气体排放、二氧化碳避免成本、技术准备和捕获的二氧化碳质量等方面,这四种方案之间存在权衡。这种稍微缺氧的工艺避免二氧化碳的成本最低,但需要在捕获的二氧化碳中容忍少量的H2、CO和轻烃,这取决于二氧化碳的最终用途,可能可行,也可能不可行。如果不可行,催化脱氧过程是次佳选择。总的来说,这项工作是第一个对从氧燃烧发电厂捕获的二氧化碳中去除O2的不同技术进行生态技术经济分析的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemical Product and Process Modeling
Chemical Product and Process Modeling ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Chemical Product and Process Modeling (CPPM) is a quarterly journal that publishes theoretical and applied research on product and process design modeling, simulation and optimization. Thanks to its international editorial board, the journal assembles the best papers from around the world on to cover the gap between product and process. The journal brings together chemical and process engineering researchers, practitioners, and software developers in a new forum for the international modeling and simulation community. Topics: equation oriented and modular simulation optimization technology for process and materials design, new modeling techniques shortcut modeling and design approaches performance of commercial and in-house simulation and optimization tools challenges faced in industrial product and process simulation and optimization computational fluid dynamics environmental process, food and pharmaceutical modeling topics drawn from the substantial areas of overlap between modeling and mathematics applied to chemical products and processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信