A Simple Visual Analog Scale is a Valuable Tool to Assess Self-ReportedAdherence in HIV-Infected Patients on Antiretroviral Treatment in aResource-Limited Setting

S. Erb, E. Letang, T. Glass, A. Natamatungiro, D. Mnzava, H. Mapesi, M. Haschke, U. Duthaler, B. Berger, L. Muri, J. Bader, C. Marzolini, L. Elzi, T. Klimkait, W. Langewitz, M. Battegay
{"title":"A Simple Visual Analog Scale is a Valuable Tool to Assess Self-ReportedAdherence in HIV-Infected Patients on Antiretroviral Treatment in aResource-Limited Setting","authors":"S. Erb, E. Letang, T. Glass, A. Natamatungiro, D. Mnzava, H. Mapesi, M. Haschke, U. Duthaler, B. Berger, L. Muri, J. Bader, C. Marzolini, L. Elzi, T. Klimkait, W. Langewitz, M. Battegay","doi":"10.4172/2155-6113.1000731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Adherence assessment in HIV-infected individuals under antiretroviral therapy (ART) is essential. The assessment tool should be reliable and easy to apply in routine clinical practice. The goal of this study was to evaluate a pictogram-enhanced visual analog scale (VAS) suitable for illiterate patients to assess self-reported adherence in ART-treated HIV-infected individuals in a resource-limited setting. Methods: Adherence of 299 HIV-infected individuals on ART for ≥ 6 months attending an HIV-clinic in rural Tanzania was prospectively assessed 1-3 months (visit V1) and 6-9 months (V2) after a healthcare provider training in patient-centered communication by various measures: 1) 1-10 pictogram-combined Likert VAS, 2) standardized questionnaire, 3) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ART-compounds and 4) plasma HIV-RNA. Results: 94% of the study population had no formal or only primary education. Individuals with non-adherence were detected in 17.2% by VAS (score ≤ 9) and in 10.7% by questionnaire (≥ 1 missed ART-dose/4weeks) at V1. The detection rate declined to a lesser extent with VAS (11.7%, p=0.06) compared to the questionnaire (5.7%, p=0.016) at V2. VAS strongly correlated with the questionnaire (kappa>0.50, p<0.0001). Test agreements between TDM and VAS (kappa ≤ 0.200) and between HIV-RNA and VAS (kappa ≤ 0.220) were weak to fair, but slighly superior compared to the questionnaire (kappa ≤ 0.180 and ≤ 0.060, respectively). Conclusion: The VAS is a valuable tool for assessing self-reported adherence in illiterate HIV-infected individuals. It is inexpensive, rapid, and easier to apply than the questionnaire. Its use should be considered in resource-limited countries where more complex measures may not be feasible.","PeriodicalId":89166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AIDS & clinical research","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-6113.1000731","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AIDS & clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6113.1000731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Adherence assessment in HIV-infected individuals under antiretroviral therapy (ART) is essential. The assessment tool should be reliable and easy to apply in routine clinical practice. The goal of this study was to evaluate a pictogram-enhanced visual analog scale (VAS) suitable for illiterate patients to assess self-reported adherence in ART-treated HIV-infected individuals in a resource-limited setting. Methods: Adherence of 299 HIV-infected individuals on ART for ≥ 6 months attending an HIV-clinic in rural Tanzania was prospectively assessed 1-3 months (visit V1) and 6-9 months (V2) after a healthcare provider training in patient-centered communication by various measures: 1) 1-10 pictogram-combined Likert VAS, 2) standardized questionnaire, 3) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ART-compounds and 4) plasma HIV-RNA. Results: 94% of the study population had no formal or only primary education. Individuals with non-adherence were detected in 17.2% by VAS (score ≤ 9) and in 10.7% by questionnaire (≥ 1 missed ART-dose/4weeks) at V1. The detection rate declined to a lesser extent with VAS (11.7%, p=0.06) compared to the questionnaire (5.7%, p=0.016) at V2. VAS strongly correlated with the questionnaire (kappa>0.50, p<0.0001). Test agreements between TDM and VAS (kappa ≤ 0.200) and between HIV-RNA and VAS (kappa ≤ 0.220) were weak to fair, but slighly superior compared to the questionnaire (kappa ≤ 0.180 and ≤ 0.060, respectively). Conclusion: The VAS is a valuable tool for assessing self-reported adherence in illiterate HIV-infected individuals. It is inexpensive, rapid, and easier to apply than the questionnaire. Its use should be considered in resource-limited countries where more complex measures may not be feasible.
在资源有限的环境下,简单的视觉模拟量表是评估hiv感染患者自我报告抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性的有价值的工具
背景:艾滋病毒感染者接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的依从性评估是必要的。评估工具应可靠,便于临床常规应用。本研究的目的是评估一种象形文字增强视觉模拟量表(VAS),该量表适用于文盲患者,以评估在资源有限的环境中接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的艾滋病毒感染者自我报告的依从性。方法:在坦桑尼亚农村hiv诊所就诊的299名hiv感染者接受ART治疗≥6个月的依从性,在医疗保健提供者接受以患者为中心的沟通培训后1-3个月(访问V1)和6-9个月(V2),通过各种措施进行前瞻性评估:1)1-10象形图联合Likert VAS, 2)标准化问卷调查,3)ART化合物治疗药物监测(TDM)和4)血浆HIV-RNA。结果:94%的研究人群没有接受过正规教育或只接受过初等教育。在V1阶段,17.2%的人通过VAS(评分≤9)和10.7%的人通过问卷(≥1次/4周)检测到不依从性。VAS的检出率(11.7%,p=0.06)比问卷的检出率(5.7%,p=0.016)下降幅度较小。VAS与问卷有较强相关性(kappa>0.50, p<0.0001)。TDM与VAS (kappa≤0.200)、HIV-RNA与VAS (kappa≤0.220)的测试一致性从弱到一般,但略优于问卷(kappa≤0.180、≤0.060)。结论:VAS是评估文盲hiv感染者自我报告依从性的一种有价值的工具。它比问卷调查更便宜、快捷、更容易应用。应考虑在资源有限的国家使用它,因为这些国家可能无法采取更复杂的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信