Local/Regional Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia in Phalanx Fractures/Dislocations.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Plastic surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-20 DOI:10.1177/22925503231180886
Matthew D Rich, Anna Rauzi, Thomas J Sorenson, Christopher Hillard, Ashish Y Mahajan
{"title":"Local/Regional Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia in Phalanx Fractures/Dislocations.","authors":"Matthew D Rich, Anna Rauzi, Thomas J Sorenson, Christopher Hillard, Ashish Y Mahajan","doi":"10.1177/22925503231180886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Traditionally, surgical repair of phalanx fractures was performed under general anesthesia. However, the emergence of regional and local anesthesia, otherwise known as Wide-awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet, provides an alternative approach where general anesthesia is undesirable. The choice of anesthetic approach resides with clinicians, though it is important to factor in the evidence that regional/local provides not only an alternative anesthesia approach but also potentially avoids comorbidities associated with general anesthesia. This study hypothesizes that the use of local/regional anesthesia for phalanx fracture/dislocation has comparable outcomes to general anesthesia and provides for fewer adverse events. <b>Methods:</b> To answer the research purpose, the investigators designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study of consecutive cases reported to the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. The study population included patients in the NSQIP database who underwent operative fixation of a phalanx fracture or dislocation in 2 cohorts, those with local/regional anesthesia or general anesthesia. The predictor variables were preoperative patient demographic data, including age, gender, surgical specialty, elective surgery, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, and open wound. <b>Results:</b> A total of 2831 patients were identified in the NSQIP database between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Local/regional anesthesia was performed in 13% of patients with the remaining 87% receiving general anesthesia. Surgical site occurrences were not clinically significant between the 2 groups. Overall, 30-day post-operative complications in the local/regional cohort included one patient with a deep vein thrombosis (0.03%) and pulmonary embolus (0.02%). Overall, 30-day post-operative complications in the general anesthesia cohort included pneumonia (0.12%) and stroke (0.08%). <b>Conclusions:</b> Surgery using the regional/local anesthesia techniques for patients with phalanx fractures or dislocations is safe and can be used in situations where general anesthesia is undesirable as post-operative 30-day complications are similar to those with general anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231180886","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traditionally, surgical repair of phalanx fractures was performed under general anesthesia. However, the emergence of regional and local anesthesia, otherwise known as Wide-awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet, provides an alternative approach where general anesthesia is undesirable. The choice of anesthetic approach resides with clinicians, though it is important to factor in the evidence that regional/local provides not only an alternative anesthesia approach but also potentially avoids comorbidities associated with general anesthesia. This study hypothesizes that the use of local/regional anesthesia for phalanx fracture/dislocation has comparable outcomes to general anesthesia and provides for fewer adverse events. Methods: To answer the research purpose, the investigators designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study of consecutive cases reported to the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. The study population included patients in the NSQIP database who underwent operative fixation of a phalanx fracture or dislocation in 2 cohorts, those with local/regional anesthesia or general anesthesia. The predictor variables were preoperative patient demographic data, including age, gender, surgical specialty, elective surgery, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, and open wound. Results: A total of 2831 patients were identified in the NSQIP database between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Local/regional anesthesia was performed in 13% of patients with the remaining 87% receiving general anesthesia. Surgical site occurrences were not clinically significant between the 2 groups. Overall, 30-day post-operative complications in the local/regional cohort included one patient with a deep vein thrombosis (0.03%) and pulmonary embolus (0.02%). Overall, 30-day post-operative complications in the general anesthesia cohort included pneumonia (0.12%) and stroke (0.08%). Conclusions: Surgery using the regional/local anesthesia techniques for patients with phalanx fractures or dislocations is safe and can be used in situations where general anesthesia is undesirable as post-operative 30-day complications are similar to those with general anesthesia.

Phalanx骨折/脱位的局部/区域麻醉与全身麻醉
背景:传统上,手术修复指骨骨折是在全身麻醉下进行的。然而,区域和局部麻醉的出现,也被称为无止血带的全清醒局部麻醉,提供了一种不需要全身麻醉的替代方法。麻醉入路的选择取决于临床医生,但重要的是要考虑到区域/局部麻醉不仅提供了一种可选择的麻醉入路,而且还可能避免与全身麻醉相关的合并症。本研究假设使用局部/区域麻醉治疗指骨骨折/脱位的结果与全身麻醉相当,并且提供更少的不良事件。方法:为了回答研究目的,研究人员设计并实施了一项回顾性队列研究,该研究纳入了2015年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间向美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库报告的连续病例。研究人群包括NSQIP数据库中接受手术固定指骨骨折或脱位的患者,分为2组,分别采用局/区域麻醉或全身麻醉。预测变量为术前患者人口统计数据,包括年龄、性别、手术专科、择期手术、糖尿病、吸烟、高血压和开放性伤口。结果:2015年1月1日至2019年12月31日,在NSQIP数据库中共发现2831例患者。13%的患者接受局/区域麻醉,其余87%的患者接受全身麻醉。两组手术部位发生率无临床差异。总体而言,局部/区域队列中30天术后并发症包括1例深静脉血栓形成(0.03%)和肺栓塞(0.02%)。总的来说,全麻组30天术后并发症包括肺炎(0.12%)和中风(0.08%)。结论:区域/局部麻醉技术对指骨骨折或脱位患者的手术是安全的,可以用于不需要全身麻醉的情况,因为术后30天的并发症与全身麻醉相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plastic surgery
Plastic surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信