Examining beliefs about language learning in relation to perceived linguistic self-confidence: learners of Korean as a foreign language in Australia

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Min Jung Jee
{"title":"Examining beliefs about language learning in relation to perceived linguistic self-confidence: learners of Korean as a foreign language in Australia","authors":"Min Jung Jee","doi":"10.17250/KHISLI.34..201709.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the language learning beliefs of students of Korean as a foreign language (KFL) in Australia. 156 students enrolled in Korean courses at a large public university in Australia completed the Beliefs About Language Learning Instrument, or BALLI (Horwitz, 1987, 1988) and items for Perceived Linguistic Self-confidence or PLS (Pyun, Kim, Cho, and Lee, 2014) in order to examine their language learning beliefs in relation to their level of PLS. For the data analysis, the KFL students were divided into three groups: High PLS group, Mid PLS group, and Low PLS group. Overall, the KFL students were neutral (total M = 3.33, SD = .27) on the statements of the BALLI, but significant differences were found among the groups in the total mean score of BALLI and the Motivation and Expectation (ME) category of the BALLI. Furthermore, the students' beliefs were found to reflect the features of good language learners, such as being open to the possibility of learning a foreign language, high expectation of learning to speak the Korean language very well, acknowledging the importance of practice, and high motivation. Among the 34 items, 10 items showed significant differences among the three groups, and generally, higher PLS students tended to be more positive than lower PLS students. Furthermore, small but significantly positive correlations were seen between the students' overall mean BALLI scores and their levels of PLS. The scores for the ME category also showed a significantly positive correlation with the students' PLS levels. Thus, those KFL students who had higher levels of PLS tended to agree more often with the BALLI statements, especially with those in the ME category, than did students with lower levels of PLS.","PeriodicalId":43095,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Research","volume":"34 1","pages":"25-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17250/KHISLI.34..201709.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This study investigated the language learning beliefs of students of Korean as a foreign language (KFL) in Australia. 156 students enrolled in Korean courses at a large public university in Australia completed the Beliefs About Language Learning Instrument, or BALLI (Horwitz, 1987, 1988) and items for Perceived Linguistic Self-confidence or PLS (Pyun, Kim, Cho, and Lee, 2014) in order to examine their language learning beliefs in relation to their level of PLS. For the data analysis, the KFL students were divided into three groups: High PLS group, Mid PLS group, and Low PLS group. Overall, the KFL students were neutral (total M = 3.33, SD = .27) on the statements of the BALLI, but significant differences were found among the groups in the total mean score of BALLI and the Motivation and Expectation (ME) category of the BALLI. Furthermore, the students' beliefs were found to reflect the features of good language learners, such as being open to the possibility of learning a foreign language, high expectation of learning to speak the Korean language very well, acknowledging the importance of practice, and high motivation. Among the 34 items, 10 items showed significant differences among the three groups, and generally, higher PLS students tended to be more positive than lower PLS students. Furthermore, small but significantly positive correlations were seen between the students' overall mean BALLI scores and their levels of PLS. The scores for the ME category also showed a significantly positive correlation with the students' PLS levels. Thus, those KFL students who had higher levels of PLS tended to agree more often with the BALLI statements, especially with those in the ME category, than did students with lower levels of PLS.
语言学习信念与感知语言自信的关系研究:澳大利亚的外语韩语学习者
本研究调查了澳大利亚对外汉语(KFL)学生的语言学习信念。在澳大利亚一所大型公立大学学习韩语课程的156名学生完成了关于语言学习工具(BALLI)的信念(Horwitz,19871988)和感知语言自信(PLS)项目(Pyun,Kim,Cho,and Lee,2014),以检查他们的语言学习信念与PLS水平的关系。为了进行数据分析,KFL学生被分为三组:高偏最小二乘法组、中偏最小二乘法和低偏最小二乘法。总体而言,KFL学生对BALLI的陈述持中立态度(总分M=3.33,SD=0.27),但在BALLI的总分和动机与期望(ME)类别方面,各组之间存在显著差异。此外,研究发现,学生的信念反映了优秀语言学习者的特点,如对学习外语的可能性持开放态度、对学好韩语的高期望、承认实践的重要性以及高动机。在34个项目中,有10个项目在三组之间表现出显著差异,总体而言,PLS水平较高的学生往往比PLS水平较低的学生更积极。此外,学生的总体平均BALLI分数与PLS水平之间存在微小但显著的正相关。ME类别的分数也与学生的PLS水平呈显著正相关。因此,那些PLS水平较高的KFL学生往往比PLS水平较低的学生更经常同意BALLI的说法,尤其是ME类别的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Linguistic Research
Linguistic Research LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Linguistic Research is an international journal which offers a forum for the discussion of theoretical research dealing with natural language data. The journal publishes articles of high quality which make a clear contribution to current debate in all branches of theoretical linguistics. The journal embraces both synchronic and diachronic perspectives, and carries articles that address language-specific as well as cross-linguistic and typological research questions. The journal features syntax, semantics, morphology, phonology, phonetics, and pragmatics and is currently published quarterly (March, June, September, and December), including the special September issue with a particular focus on applied linguistics covering (second) language acquisition, ESL/EFL, conversation/discourse analysis, etc. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to double-blind peer review by independent expert referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信