“Safe” and “suitably qualified”: Professionalising private security through mandatory training: a New Zealand case study

IF 1.1 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
T. Bradley
{"title":"“Safe” and “suitably qualified”: Professionalising private security through mandatory training: a New Zealand case study","authors":"T. Bradley","doi":"10.1080/01924036.2020.1719528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT When enacted in 2011 the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act (2010) finally replaced an obsolete regulatory framework first introduced in New Zealand three decades earlier. Its advocates claimed the Act would raise standards, reduce risk and enhance the industry’s tarnished reputation by ensuring security personnel would henceforth be suitably qualified. Among various changes made in pursuit of these objectives arguably the most important was the introduction of mandatory training. Five years have now passed since mandatory training commenced and with the first licence renewal process now complete, consideration of whether the Act, and mandatory training, has achieved its key aims is particularly timely. This article presents analyses of primary licencing, training and qualification data to provide a tentative empirical answer to this fundamental question.","PeriodicalId":45887,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01924036.2020.1719528","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2020.1719528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT When enacted in 2011 the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act (2010) finally replaced an obsolete regulatory framework first introduced in New Zealand three decades earlier. Its advocates claimed the Act would raise standards, reduce risk and enhance the industry’s tarnished reputation by ensuring security personnel would henceforth be suitably qualified. Among various changes made in pursuit of these objectives arguably the most important was the introduction of mandatory training. Five years have now passed since mandatory training commenced and with the first licence renewal process now complete, consideration of whether the Act, and mandatory training, has achieved its key aims is particularly timely. This article presents analyses of primary licencing, training and qualification data to provide a tentative empirical answer to this fundamental question.
“安全”和“适当合格”:通过强制性培训使私人保安专业化:新西兰案例研究
摘要2011年颁布的《私人安保人员和私人调查员法》(2010年)最终取代了30年前在新西兰首次引入的过时监管框架。其支持者声称,该法案将提高标准,降低风险,并通过确保安全人员从此具备适当的资格来提高该行业受损的声誉。在为实现这些目标而做出的各种改变中,可以说最重要的是引入了强制性培训。强制性培训开始以来已经过去了五年,随着第一次执照续期程序的完成,对该法案和强制性培训是否实现了其关键目标的考虑尤其及时。本文对初级许可证、培训和资格数据进行了分析,为这个基本问题提供了一个初步的实证答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信