Professional digital competence (PDC) in teacher education – teacher candidates reasoning about programming when involved in problem-solving activities with digital tools

Q1 Social Sciences
Emma Edstrand, J. Sjöberg
{"title":"Professional digital competence (PDC) in teacher education – teacher candidates reasoning about programming when involved in problem-solving activities with digital tools","authors":"Emma Edstrand, J. Sjöberg","doi":"10.1080/21532974.2023.2210317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The increased emergence of digital tools in educational contexts have changed the conditions for teaching and learning which, in turn, has meant a need for the development of professional digital competence (PDC) among teachers worldwide. Simultaneously, and aligned with this, programming has become an increasingly important part of schooling in many parts of the world and a step toward developing computational thinking. In this paper we investigate teacher candidates reasoning about programming when involved in problem-solving activities with digital tools. The unit of analysis is programming activities conducted by a group of 17 teacher candidates in a Swedish primary teacher education. The research question posed is: How do digital tools co-determine teacher candidates’ reasoning about programming and its pedagogical application during problem-solving activities with digital tools designed for teaching? Drawing from a sociocultural approach, the results of the present study imply that the teacher candidate’s appropriation of knowledge is co-determined by the digital tool itself and as such it does not provide any deeper understanding for its pedagogical use.","PeriodicalId":52191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education","volume":"39 1","pages":"132 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2210317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The increased emergence of digital tools in educational contexts have changed the conditions for teaching and learning which, in turn, has meant a need for the development of professional digital competence (PDC) among teachers worldwide. Simultaneously, and aligned with this, programming has become an increasingly important part of schooling in many parts of the world and a step toward developing computational thinking. In this paper we investigate teacher candidates reasoning about programming when involved in problem-solving activities with digital tools. The unit of analysis is programming activities conducted by a group of 17 teacher candidates in a Swedish primary teacher education. The research question posed is: How do digital tools co-determine teacher candidates’ reasoning about programming and its pedagogical application during problem-solving activities with digital tools designed for teaching? Drawing from a sociocultural approach, the results of the present study imply that the teacher candidate’s appropriation of knowledge is co-determined by the digital tool itself and as such it does not provide any deeper understanding for its pedagogical use.
教师教育中的专业数字能力(PDC)——教师候选人在使用数字工具解决问题时对编程进行推理
数字工具在教育环境中的日益出现已经改变了教学和学习的条件,这反过来又意味着需要在全球教师中发展专业数字能力(PDC)。与此同时,与此相一致的是,在世界上许多地方,编程已经成为学校教育中越来越重要的一部分,也是发展计算思维的一步。在本文中,我们调查了教师候选人在使用数字工具进行问题解决活动时对编程的推理。分析单元是由一组17名瑞典小学教师教育的教师候选人进行的方案活动。提出的研究问题是:数字工具如何共同决定教师候选人在使用为教学设计的数字工具解决问题的活动中对编程及其教学应用的推理?从社会文化的角度来看,本研究的结果表明,教师候选人对知识的占有是由数字工具本身共同决定的,因此它并没有为其教学用途提供任何更深入的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信