Methods used to assess insight in individuals with eating disorders: a scoping review.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Mental Health Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-11 DOI:10.1080/09638237.2022.2069696
Scott J Fatt, Deborah Mitchison, Kay Bussey, Jonathan Mond
{"title":"Methods used to assess insight in individuals with eating disorders: a scoping review.","authors":"Scott J Fatt, Deborah Mitchison, Kay Bussey, Jonathan Mond","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2022.2069696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Insight can be impaired in individuals with an eating disorder and the nature of this impairment can vary. Although this topic has been the focus of several studies and reviews, methodologies used to assess insight have received less attention. A scoping review was conducted using a systematic search of articles before January 2021 to elucidate the methodologies used to assess insight in those with an eating disorder, with discussion of strengths and limitations. A total of 3089 studies were screened, and 24 quantitative studies which assessed at least one aspect of insight in individuals with an eating disorder were included in the review. Methods of assessing insight included coding of clinical notes, low scores on measures of self-report symptoms, direct assessment of insight, vignette, and self-report single-item questions. Insight into disordered eating symptoms was most frequently assessed. Most research used samples who were female, white, diagnosed with anorexia nervosa, and were seeking or receiving treatment. In designing future research and interventions, optimal methods used to assess insight should consider the research/clinical question, available resources, and the targeted demographic. Further, descriptions of which aspects of insight are being assessed should be considered in the interpretation of both current and future findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"141-152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2022.2069696","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Insight can be impaired in individuals with an eating disorder and the nature of this impairment can vary. Although this topic has been the focus of several studies and reviews, methodologies used to assess insight have received less attention. A scoping review was conducted using a systematic search of articles before January 2021 to elucidate the methodologies used to assess insight in those with an eating disorder, with discussion of strengths and limitations. A total of 3089 studies were screened, and 24 quantitative studies which assessed at least one aspect of insight in individuals with an eating disorder were included in the review. Methods of assessing insight included coding of clinical notes, low scores on measures of self-report symptoms, direct assessment of insight, vignette, and self-report single-item questions. Insight into disordered eating symptoms was most frequently assessed. Most research used samples who were female, white, diagnosed with anorexia nervosa, and were seeking or receiving treatment. In designing future research and interventions, optimal methods used to assess insight should consider the research/clinical question, available resources, and the targeted demographic. Further, descriptions of which aspects of insight are being assessed should be considered in the interpretation of both current and future findings.

用于评估饮食失调患者洞察力的方法:范围界定综述。
进食障碍患者的洞察力可能会受损,这种受损的性质可能会有所不同。尽管这一主题一直是几项研究和评论的焦点,但用于评估洞察力的方法却很少受到关注。通过对2021年1月之前的文章进行系统搜索,进行了范围界定审查,以阐明用于评估饮食障碍患者洞察力的方法,并讨论其优势和局限性。共筛选了3089项研究,其中包括24项定量研究,这些研究评估了饮食障碍患者的至少一个方面的洞察力。评估洞察力的方法包括临床笔记的编码、自我报告症状的低分测量、洞察力的直接评估、小插曲和自我报告的单项问题。对饮食紊乱症状的洞察是最常见的评估。大多数研究使用了女性、白人、被诊断为神经性厌食症、正在寻求或接受治疗的样本。在设计未来的研究和干预措施时,用于评估洞察力的最佳方法应考虑研究/临床问题、可用资源和目标人群。此外,在解释当前和未来的调查结果时,应考虑对洞察力的哪些方面进行评估的描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信