“It’s To Protect the Country!”: The Everyday Performance of Border Security in Sweden

IF 0.8 Q4 DEMOGRAPHY
Mette Skaarup
{"title":"“It’s To Protect the Country!”: The Everyday Performance of Border Security in Sweden","authors":"Mette Skaarup","doi":"10.33134/NJMR.422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2015, Sweden introduced inner border control. Five years later, the ‘temporary’ controls remain. Their increasing permanence raises urgent questions about the logics that undergird the exercise of biopolitical border security and the relationship between intent and practices on the ground. Drawing on in-depth interviews with Swedish border guards and fieldwork conducted at Hyllie Station—the first station en route from Denmark—this article contributes original ethnographic research on the sparsely researched Swedish border control and the work routines of Swedish border professionals. The central theoretical contribution of the article is the consideration of how discretion and a range of mundane factors complicate the realisation of biopolitics. The article further contributes to the scholarship on everyday bordering practices with methodological reflections on the importance of studying the ‘unspectacular’ border sites and a firm reminder that not all borders have turned into semi-automated, smart data borders. Overall, the article argues that the border control at Hyllie functions according to a ‘leaky’ (Marr 2012: 84) biopolitics; not a monolithic performance of overarching state objectives, but one assembled ad hoc, constrained by resource availability and shaped by the discretion exercised by border officers.","PeriodicalId":45097,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Migration Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Migration Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33134/NJMR.422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In 2015, Sweden introduced inner border control. Five years later, the ‘temporary’ controls remain. Their increasing permanence raises urgent questions about the logics that undergird the exercise of biopolitical border security and the relationship between intent and practices on the ground. Drawing on in-depth interviews with Swedish border guards and fieldwork conducted at Hyllie Station—the first station en route from Denmark—this article contributes original ethnographic research on the sparsely researched Swedish border control and the work routines of Swedish border professionals. The central theoretical contribution of the article is the consideration of how discretion and a range of mundane factors complicate the realisation of biopolitics. The article further contributes to the scholarship on everyday bordering practices with methodological reflections on the importance of studying the ‘unspectacular’ border sites and a firm reminder that not all borders have turned into semi-automated, smart data borders. Overall, the article argues that the border control at Hyllie functions according to a ‘leaky’ (Marr 2012: 84) biopolitics; not a monolithic performance of overarching state objectives, but one assembled ad hoc, constrained by resource availability and shaped by the discretion exercised by border officers.
“这是为了保卫国家!”:瑞典边境安全的日常表现
2015年,瑞典引入了内部边境管制。五年后,“临时”管制依然存在。它们日益增长的持久性引发了关于生物政治边境安全运作背后的逻辑以及实地意图与实践之间关系的紧迫问题。通过对瑞典边防人员的深入采访和在Hyllie站(从丹麦出发的第一个站)进行的实地调查,本文对瑞典边境管制和瑞典边境专业人员的工作惯例进行了原始的民族志研究。这篇文章的核心理论贡献是考虑了自由裁量权和一系列世俗因素是如何使生命政治的实现复杂化的。这篇文章进一步对日常边界实践的学术研究做出了贡献,对研究“不引人注目”的边界地点的重要性进行了方法论反思,并坚定地提醒人们,并非所有的边界都变成了半自动的智能数据边界。总体而言,文章认为,Hyllie的边境管制是根据一种“泄漏的”(Marr 2012: 84)生物政治运作的;这不是一个整体的国家目标,而是一个特别的集合,受到资源可用性的限制,并由边境官员行使自由裁量权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
13
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信