“Work Is Mandaa”: Breadwinning, Sexual Fitness, and Anti-Productivism among Cycle Rickshaw Men in North India

IF 0.6 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Patrick Beckhorn
{"title":"“Work Is Mandaa”: Breadwinning, Sexual Fitness, and Anti-Productivism among Cycle Rickshaw Men in North India","authors":"Patrick Beckhorn","doi":"10.1111/awr.12214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Men who migrate to Delhi, India, from West Bengal to fulfill the male breadwinner expectation by operating cycle rickshaws claim that business is slow, which keeps their families’ expectations for remittances low and helps camouflage their slacking. Slacking is a crucial activity in light of the men’s belief that operating a cycle rickshaw dries out their bodies such that it reduces their sexual fitness. Their laziness supports the masculine goal of remaining sexually fit, and when they privilege this goal over the demand for productivity inherent in the breadwinner role, the standard analytic of productive versus reproductive labor becomes untenable. It is instead argued that the men’s behavior reveals a limited case of anti-productivism. Studies of anti-productivism are usually confined to Western workers, and those that take gender into account usually focus on workers’ gendered positions in society’s division of labor. This article shows how clashes between gender ideals at the somatic level can provoke an anti-productivist response. It also shows that tension between culturally particular ideas about the embodied consequences of labor performance and workers’ gendered body ideals can have profound effects on the workers’ orientation to their labor.<sup>1</sup></p>","PeriodicalId":43035,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology of Work Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/awr.12214","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology of Work Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/awr.12214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Men who migrate to Delhi, India, from West Bengal to fulfill the male breadwinner expectation by operating cycle rickshaws claim that business is slow, which keeps their families’ expectations for remittances low and helps camouflage their slacking. Slacking is a crucial activity in light of the men’s belief that operating a cycle rickshaw dries out their bodies such that it reduces their sexual fitness. Their laziness supports the masculine goal of remaining sexually fit, and when they privilege this goal over the demand for productivity inherent in the breadwinner role, the standard analytic of productive versus reproductive labor becomes untenable. It is instead argued that the men’s behavior reveals a limited case of anti-productivism. Studies of anti-productivism are usually confined to Western workers, and those that take gender into account usually focus on workers’ gendered positions in society’s division of labor. This article shows how clashes between gender ideals at the somatic level can provoke an anti-productivist response. It also shows that tension between culturally particular ideas about the embodied consequences of labor performance and workers’ gendered body ideals can have profound effects on the workers’ orientation to their labor.1

“工作是Mandaa”:印度北部人力车司机的养家糊口、性健康和反生产主义
从西孟加拉邦移民到印度德里的男性通过经营人力车来满足男性养家糊口的期望,他们声称生意缓慢,这使他们的家人对汇款的期望很低,并有助于掩饰他们的懈怠。偷懒是一项至关重要的活动,因为男性认为驾驶人力车会使他们的身体变干,从而降低他们的性能力。他们的懒惰支持男性保持性感的目标,当他们把这个目标置于养家糊口的角色所固有的生产力需求之上时,生产性劳动与生殖劳动的标准分析就站不住脚了。相反,有人认为,这些人的行为揭示了一个有限的反生产主义案例。反生产主义的研究通常局限于西方工人,而那些考虑到性别的研究通常关注工人在社会劳动分工中的性别地位。这篇文章展示了躯体层面的性别理想之间的冲突如何引发反生产主义的反应。它还表明,关于劳动表现的具体后果的文化特定观念与工人的性别身体理想之间的紧张关系可以对工人的劳动取向产生深远的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信