Limitaciones Técnicas del Método de Conteo de Anulaciones del Cemento para Estimación de Edad. Hallazgos a Partir de Una Revisión con Búsqueda Sistemática
Fernando Rivera-Mendoza, P. V. Espinoza-Silva, G. M. Fonseca, Fernando Rivera Mendoza
{"title":"Limitaciones Técnicas del Método de Conteo de Anulaciones del Cemento para Estimación de Edad. Hallazgos a Partir de Una Revisión con Búsqueda Sistemática","authors":"Fernando Rivera-Mendoza, P. V. Espinoza-Silva, G. M. Fonseca, Fernando Rivera Mendoza","doi":"10.4067/s0717-95022023000300733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the limitations of the TCA count method according to the current normative and methodological standards. A scoping review was carried out for TCA count methods for AE, including experimental studies and technical notes in the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science (WoS) and Embase databases. The terms \"estimation”, “age” and “cementum” were used, with a complementary manual search in Google Scholar. Reviews, studies in archaeological collections, radiological studies and letters to the editor were excluded. The search yielded a total of 273 articles, selecting 27 of them that met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies were published in Asia, particularly India (n=21). Only 6 articles declared the total number of individuals, types of teeth, and histological sections, with the premolar being the most studied. Only two articles evaluated the quality of the sample to be analyzed through the legibility of the cuts obtained. The most widely used test to assess the precision of the method was the Pearson correlation coefficient (n=21). These findings expose the high heterogeneity reported in EE methodologies by counting TCA, so there is still no standardized process that covers in all its stages and delivers reliable results following current legal standards for scientific evidence. More control of the detected technical limitations will increase the value as evidence in a legal or forensic identification context.","PeriodicalId":90864,"journal":{"name":"International journal of morphology = Revista internacional de morfologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of morphology = Revista internacional de morfologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-95022023000300733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
the limitations of the TCA count method according to the current normative and methodological standards. A scoping review was carried out for TCA count methods for AE, including experimental studies and technical notes in the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science (WoS) and Embase databases. The terms "estimation”, “age” and “cementum” were used, with a complementary manual search in Google Scholar. Reviews, studies in archaeological collections, radiological studies and letters to the editor were excluded. The search yielded a total of 273 articles, selecting 27 of them that met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies were published in Asia, particularly India (n=21). Only 6 articles declared the total number of individuals, types of teeth, and histological sections, with the premolar being the most studied. Only two articles evaluated the quality of the sample to be analyzed through the legibility of the cuts obtained. The most widely used test to assess the precision of the method was the Pearson correlation coefficient (n=21). These findings expose the high heterogeneity reported in EE methodologies by counting TCA, so there is still no standardized process that covers in all its stages and delivers reliable results following current legal standards for scientific evidence. More control of the detected technical limitations will increase the value as evidence in a legal or forensic identification context.
根据现行规范和方法标准,TCA计数方法的局限性。对AE的TCA计数方法进行了范围审查,包括PubMed/Medline、Scopus、Web of Science(WoS)和Embase数据库中的实验研究和技术说明。使用了术语“估计”、“年龄”和“牙骨质”,并在谷歌学者中进行了补充手动搜索。评论、考古收藏研究、放射学研究和给编辑的信都被排除在外。搜索共产生273篇文章,其中27篇符合入选标准。大多数研究发表在亚洲,尤其是印度(n=21)只有6篇文章公布了个体总数、牙齿类型和组织学切片,其中前臼齿是研究最多的。只有两篇文章通过所获得的切口的易读性来评估待分析样本的质量。评估该方法精度的最广泛使用的测试是Pearson相关系数(n=21)。这些发现暴露了通过计算TCA在EE方法中报告的高度异质性,因此仍然没有标准化的过程涵盖其所有阶段,并根据当前的科学证据法律标准提供可靠的结果。对检测到的技术限制进行更多的控制,将增加在法律或法医鉴定背景下作为证据的价值。