{"title":"Introduction: The Genesis of ‘“Anal” and “Sexual”’","authors":"S. P. Brilmyer, Filippo Trentin","doi":"10.3366/pah.2022.0408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This introduction contextualizes Lou Andreas-Salomé’s 1916 essay ‘“Anal” and “Sexual”’ within early psychoanalytic debates about anal sexuality, narcissism, and subject-formation, and gestures toward its relevance for recent thinking in queer theory and critical race studies. While Andreas-Salomé’s work has often been read as a gloss to Freud’s sexual theory, we emphasize the originality of her contributions to psychoanalytic discourse. Not only did ‘“Anal” and “Sexual”’ impact Freud’s understanding of the long-lasting influence of anal repression on the psyche, but it anticipates the concerns of more recent theorists with how subjects are gendered and racialized through processes of corporeal symbolization.","PeriodicalId":42579,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalysis and History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoanalysis and History","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/pah.2022.0408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This introduction contextualizes Lou Andreas-Salomé’s 1916 essay ‘“Anal” and “Sexual”’ within early psychoanalytic debates about anal sexuality, narcissism, and subject-formation, and gestures toward its relevance for recent thinking in queer theory and critical race studies. While Andreas-Salomé’s work has often been read as a gloss to Freud’s sexual theory, we emphasize the originality of her contributions to psychoanalytic discourse. Not only did ‘“Anal” and “Sexual”’ impact Freud’s understanding of the long-lasting influence of anal repression on the psyche, but it anticipates the concerns of more recent theorists with how subjects are gendered and racialized through processes of corporeal symbolization.
这篇引言将Lou Andreas Salomé1916年的文章《肛门》和《性》置于早期关于肛门性行为、自恋和主体形成的精神分析辩论中,并表明其与酷儿理论和批判性种族研究中的近期思维的相关性。虽然安德烈亚斯·萨洛梅的作品经常被解读为弗洛伊德性理论的粉饰,但我们强调她对精神分析话语的贡献的独创性。“肛门”和“性”不仅影响了弗洛伊德对肛门压迫对心理的长期影响的理解,而且也预见到了最近理论家对主体如何通过物质象征过程被性别化和种族化的担忧。