{"title":"Extended Remembering: Georges Perec and Writing as Thinking","authors":"Mats Haraldsen","doi":"10.5325/style.57.1.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:What are the relations among writing, thinking, and remembering? This article sets forth the epistemological claim that Georges Perec's book W, or the Memory of Childhood is an integrated part of Perec's cognitive process of remembering. By drawing on the extended mind thesis, as well as recent work on memory within cognitive science, it argues that Perec's cognitive processes are extended into his text and, furthermore, that they are partly accessible to his readers. This approach thus sidesteps many of the debates regarding the author's intention in literary studies by arguing that what is at stake in W is not whether Perec's intention is deducible or not by the text, but rather how much and in what way the author's extended thought processes are available in the text. In the conclusion, some of the implications of this view for the study of fictionalized accounts of the past are sketched out.","PeriodicalId":45300,"journal":{"name":"STYLE","volume":"57 1","pages":"11 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STYLE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/style.57.1.0011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
abstract:What are the relations among writing, thinking, and remembering? This article sets forth the epistemological claim that Georges Perec's book W, or the Memory of Childhood is an integrated part of Perec's cognitive process of remembering. By drawing on the extended mind thesis, as well as recent work on memory within cognitive science, it argues that Perec's cognitive processes are extended into his text and, furthermore, that they are partly accessible to his readers. This approach thus sidesteps many of the debates regarding the author's intention in literary studies by arguing that what is at stake in W is not whether Perec's intention is deducible or not by the text, but rather how much and in what way the author's extended thought processes are available in the text. In the conclusion, some of the implications of this view for the study of fictionalized accounts of the past are sketched out.
期刊介绍:
Style invites submissions that address questions of style, stylistics, and poetics, including research and theory in discourse analysis, literary and nonliterary genres, narrative, figuration, metrics, rhetorical analysis, and the pedagogy of style. Contributions may draw from such fields as literary criticism, critical theory, computational linguistics, cognitive linguistics, philosophy of language, and rhetoric and writing studies. In addition, Style publishes reviews, review-essays, surveys, interviews, translations, enumerative and annotated bibliographies, and reports on conferences.