Transaction Cost Analysis of Digital Innovation Governance in the UK Energy Market

IF 0.3 Q4 ECONOMICS
Colin Nolden
{"title":"Transaction Cost Analysis of Digital Innovation Governance in the UK Energy Market","authors":"Colin Nolden","doi":"10.21314/JEM.2019.194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Energy markets are undergoing significant changes. Legacy systems developed around inflexible, centralized and monodirectional supplies are being replaced by flexible, distributed and bidirectional supply-and-demand systems. Where legacy systems are less entrenched, such as in decentralized renewable energy, flexibility and energy service markets, the pace of change is faster, and new technologies, business models and ideas are more likely to be tested and applied. This conceptual paper analyzes the changing governance of decentralized renewable energy, flexibility and energy services in the United Kingdom from a transaction cost perspective. Particular emphasis is placed on the impact of potentially disruptive innovations such as distributed ledgers, emerging digital technologies and big data analytics on the one hand, and the need for value creation from just and affordable decarbonization on the other. In doing so, this paper sheds light on some contradictions between current energy governance and the requirements for a decarbonized, decentralized, digitalized and democratized energy system. The paper concludes that energy governance is increasingly shaped by decentralization and digitalization, which can either facilitate or inhibit value creation through democratization (social value) and decarbonization (environmental value).<br>","PeriodicalId":43528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy Markets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/JEM.2019.194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Energy markets are undergoing significant changes. Legacy systems developed around inflexible, centralized and monodirectional supplies are being replaced by flexible, distributed and bidirectional supply-and-demand systems. Where legacy systems are less entrenched, such as in decentralized renewable energy, flexibility and energy service markets, the pace of change is faster, and new technologies, business models and ideas are more likely to be tested and applied. This conceptual paper analyzes the changing governance of decentralized renewable energy, flexibility and energy services in the United Kingdom from a transaction cost perspective. Particular emphasis is placed on the impact of potentially disruptive innovations such as distributed ledgers, emerging digital technologies and big data analytics on the one hand, and the need for value creation from just and affordable decarbonization on the other. In doing so, this paper sheds light on some contradictions between current energy governance and the requirements for a decarbonized, decentralized, digitalized and democratized energy system. The paper concludes that energy governance is increasingly shaped by decentralization and digitalization, which can either facilitate or inhibit value creation through democratization (social value) and decarbonization (environmental value).
英国能源市场数字创新治理的交易成本分析
能源市场正在发生重大变化。围绕不灵活、集中和单向供应开发的传统系统正在被灵活、分布式和双向供需系统所取代。在传统系统不那么根深蒂固的地方,如分散的可再生能源、灵活性和能源服务市场,变革的步伐更快,新技术、商业模式和理念更有可能得到测试和应用。这篇概念性论文从交易成本的角度分析了英国分散的可再生能源、灵活性和能源服务的治理变化。特别强调的是分布式账本、新兴数字技术和大数据分析等潜在颠覆性创新的影响,以及从公正和负担得起的脱碳中创造价值的必要性。在这样做的过程中,本文揭示了当前能源治理与脱碳、去中心化、数字化和民主化能源系统要求之间的一些矛盾。论文得出的结论是,能源治理越来越受到权力下放和数字化的影响,它们可以通过民主化(社会价值)和脱碳(环境价值)促进或抑制价值创造。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信