Hocus POCUS or Crucial Tool? Attitudes of General Practice Training Scheme Program Directors to Point of Care Ultrasound

M. O'Sullivan, S. Walkin
{"title":"Hocus POCUS or Crucial Tool? Attitudes of General Practice Training Scheme Program Directors to Point of Care Ultrasound","authors":"M. O'Sullivan, S. Walkin","doi":"10.4172/2329-9126.1000351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Point of care ultrasound is used in several medical specialties but has not yet been widely adopted in primary care in Ireland. This study explored the attitudes of GP training scheme program directors towards POCUS. This included views on clinical use and implications for postgraduate GP training.Methods: This was a mixed methods study. A survey was distributed to all GP training scheme program directors in the Republic of Ireland. The survey included questions regarding clinical use and current provision of education in point of care ultrasound to GP trainees in individual schemes. A focus group examining similar themes was also done.Results: 50% of PDs responded to the survey. No scheme had an established training program in POCUS, and only one was considering starting one. Reasons cited included perceived lack of trainee interest, lack of faculty expertise, and lack of time and resources, including equipment. Potential uses for POCUS included basic obstetric examinations for detection of foetal heart activity, and right upper quadrant ultrasound for investigation of biliary colic. Facilitators to the use of ultrasound included rapidity of diagnosis and patient satisfaction, while barriers included lack of expertise and equipment, and concerns about clinical indemnity. The focus group corroborated these findings. PDs participating in the focus group also raise concerns about time and resource constraints both in practice and in training programs, the lack of a critical mass of expertise in the GP training community, the risk of over diagnosis, and concerns around quality assurance. The potential for “creep” effect was recognized. The group saw POCUS as having a limited potential role in a small number of clinical scenarios. Facilitators to use included patient satisfaction and increasing miniaturization and affordability of equipment.Conclusions: There are currently no established training programs in POCUS for GP trainees in Ireland and there are no immediate plans to establish any. There is limited interest in its use in clinical practice, with multiple barriers identified.","PeriodicalId":90594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of general practice (Los Angeles, Calif.)","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2329-9126.1000351","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of general practice (Los Angeles, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9126.1000351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Point of care ultrasound is used in several medical specialties but has not yet been widely adopted in primary care in Ireland. This study explored the attitudes of GP training scheme program directors towards POCUS. This included views on clinical use and implications for postgraduate GP training.Methods: This was a mixed methods study. A survey was distributed to all GP training scheme program directors in the Republic of Ireland. The survey included questions regarding clinical use and current provision of education in point of care ultrasound to GP trainees in individual schemes. A focus group examining similar themes was also done.Results: 50% of PDs responded to the survey. No scheme had an established training program in POCUS, and only one was considering starting one. Reasons cited included perceived lack of trainee interest, lack of faculty expertise, and lack of time and resources, including equipment. Potential uses for POCUS included basic obstetric examinations for detection of foetal heart activity, and right upper quadrant ultrasound for investigation of biliary colic. Facilitators to the use of ultrasound included rapidity of diagnosis and patient satisfaction, while barriers included lack of expertise and equipment, and concerns about clinical indemnity. The focus group corroborated these findings. PDs participating in the focus group also raise concerns about time and resource constraints both in practice and in training programs, the lack of a critical mass of expertise in the GP training community, the risk of over diagnosis, and concerns around quality assurance. The potential for “creep” effect was recognized. The group saw POCUS as having a limited potential role in a small number of clinical scenarios. Facilitators to use included patient satisfaction and increasing miniaturization and affordability of equipment.Conclusions: There are currently no established training programs in POCUS for GP trainees in Ireland and there are no immediate plans to establish any. There is limited interest in its use in clinical practice, with multiple barriers identified.
冰球POCUS还是关键工具?全科医学培训计划主任对护理点超声的态度
引言:护理点超声波在几个医学专业中都有使用,但在爱尔兰的初级保健中尚未广泛采用。本研究探讨了全科医生培训计划项目负责人对POCUS的态度。这包括对临床使用和对研究生全科医生培训的影响的看法。方法:采用混合方法进行研究。向爱尔兰共和国所有全科医生培训计划项目负责人分发了一份调查报告。该调查包括有关临床使用和目前在个人计划中为全科医生受训人员提供护理点超声波教育的问题。还成立了一个研究类似主题的焦点小组。结果:50%的PD对调查做出了回应。没有一个计划在POCUS有既定的培训计划,只有一个计划正在考虑启动一个。列举的原因包括学员缺乏兴趣、教师专业知识以及缺乏时间和资源,包括设备。POCUS的潜在用途包括用于检测胎儿心脏活动的基本产科检查,以及用于调查胆绞痛的右上象限超声。超声波使用的推动者包括诊断的快速性和患者的满意度,而障碍包括缺乏专业知识和设备,以及对临床赔偿的担忧。焦点小组证实了这些发现。参与焦点小组的PD还对实践和培训计划中的时间和资源限制、全科医生培训社区缺乏关键的专业知识、过度诊断的风险以及对质量保证的担忧表示担忧。人们认识到了“蠕变”效应的潜力。该小组认为POCUS在少数临床场景中的潜在作用有限。使用的促进者包括患者满意度以及设备日益小型化和可负担性。结论:目前在POCUS没有为爱尔兰的全科医生受训人员制定培训计划,也没有立即制定任何计划。人们对其在临床实践中的应用兴趣有限,发现了多种障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信