Effect of co-culture of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells with pancreatic islets on viability and function outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Bianca Marmontel de Souza, Ana Paula Bouças, Fernanda Dos Santos de Oliveira, Karina Pires Reis, Patrícia Ziegelmann, Andrea Carla Bauer, Daisy Crispim
{"title":"Effect of co-culture of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells with pancreatic islets on viability and function outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bianca Marmontel de Souza, Ana Paula Bouças, Fernanda Dos Santos de Oliveira, Karina Pires Reis, Patrícia Ziegelmann, Andrea Carla Bauer, Daisy Crispim","doi":"10.1080/19382014.2017.1286434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The maintenance of viable and functional pancreatic islets is crucial for successful islet transplantation from brain-dead donors. To overcome islet quality loss during culture, some studies have co-cultured islets with mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC). However, it is still uncertain if MSC-secreted factors are enough to improve islet quality or if a physical contact between MSCs and islets is needed. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the effect of different culture contact systems of islets with MSCs on viability and insulin secretion outcomes. Pubmed and Embase were searched. Twenty studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis and/or meta-analysis. For both outcomes, pooled weighted mean differences (WMD) between islet cultured alone (control group) and the co-culture condition were calculated. Viability mean was higher in islets co-cultured with MSCs compared with islet cultured alone [WMD = 18.08 (95% CI 12.59-23.57)]. The improvement in viability was higher in islets co-cultured in indirect or mixed contact with MSCs than in direct physical contact (P <0.001). Moreover, the mean of insulin stimulation index (ISI) was higher in islets from co-culture condition compared with islet cultured alone [WMD = 0.83 (95% CI 0.54-1.13)], independently of contact system. Results from the studies that were analyzed only qualitatively are in accordance with meta-analysis data. Co-culture of islets with MSCs has the potential for protecting islets from injury during culture period. Moreover, culture time appears to influence the beneficial effect of different methods of co-culture on viability and function of islets.</p>","PeriodicalId":14671,"journal":{"name":"Islets","volume":"9 1","pages":"30-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19382014.2017.1286434","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islets","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19382014.2017.1286434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

The maintenance of viable and functional pancreatic islets is crucial for successful islet transplantation from brain-dead donors. To overcome islet quality loss during culture, some studies have co-cultured islets with mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC). However, it is still uncertain if MSC-secreted factors are enough to improve islet quality or if a physical contact between MSCs and islets is needed. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the effect of different culture contact systems of islets with MSCs on viability and insulin secretion outcomes. Pubmed and Embase were searched. Twenty studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis and/or meta-analysis. For both outcomes, pooled weighted mean differences (WMD) between islet cultured alone (control group) and the co-culture condition were calculated. Viability mean was higher in islets co-cultured with MSCs compared with islet cultured alone [WMD = 18.08 (95% CI 12.59-23.57)]. The improvement in viability was higher in islets co-cultured in indirect or mixed contact with MSCs than in direct physical contact (P <0.001). Moreover, the mean of insulin stimulation index (ISI) was higher in islets from co-culture condition compared with islet cultured alone [WMD = 0.83 (95% CI 0.54-1.13)], independently of contact system. Results from the studies that were analyzed only qualitatively are in accordance with meta-analysis data. Co-culture of islets with MSCs has the potential for protecting islets from injury during culture period. Moreover, culture time appears to influence the beneficial effect of different methods of co-culture on viability and function of islets.

间充质干细胞/基质细胞与胰岛共培养对生存能力和功能结果的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析
摘要维持存活和功能性胰岛对于脑死亡供体胰岛移植的成功至关重要。为了克服培养过程中胰岛质量的损失,一些研究将胰岛与间充质干细胞/基质细胞(MSC)共同培养。然而,MSC分泌的因子是否足以改善胰岛质量,或者MSC和胰岛之间是否需要物理接触,仍不确定。因此,我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以阐明具有间充质干细胞的胰岛的不同培养接触系统对生存能力和胰岛素分泌结果的影响。Pubmed和Embase被搜查。20项研究符合资格标准,并被纳入定性综合和/或荟萃分析。对于这两种结果,计算单独培养的胰岛(对照组)和共同培养条件之间的合并加权平均差(WMD)。与单独培养的胰岛相比,与MSCs共培养的胰岛的存活率平均值更高[MWM=18.08(95%CI 12.59-23.57)]。与MSCs间接或混合接触共培养的小岛的存活率提高高于直接物理接触(P<0.001)。此外,与单独培养的胰岛相比,共培养条件下的胰岛的胰岛素刺激指数(ISI)平均值更高[MWM=0.83(95%CI 0.54-1.13)],与接触系统无关。仅进行定性分析的研究结果与荟萃分析数据一致。与MSCs共培养胰岛具有保护胰岛在培养期间免受损伤的潜力。此外,培养时间似乎会影响不同共培养方法对胰岛活力和功能的有益影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Islets
Islets ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
10
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Islets is the first international, peer-reviewed research journal dedicated to islet biology. Islets publishes high-quality clinical and experimental research into the physiology and pathology of the islets of Langerhans. In addition to original research manuscripts, Islets is the leading source for cutting-edge Perspectives, Reviews and Commentaries. Our goal is to foster communication and a rapid exchange of information through timely publication of important results using print as well as electronic formats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信